Skip to main content

Security report for fbcliberec.cz

FBC Liberec · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FBC Liberec is a local sports club focused on floorball activities in the Liberec region of the Czech Republic. The website serves as an informational portal for the club's activities, training sessions, and recruitment. The business operates primarily as a community sports organization with a small scale and local market presence. The domain age of over 20 years supports the legitimacy and established nature of the club. Technically, the website is built with basic HTML and CSS, utilizing Bootstrap for styling. There is no evidence of advanced CMS or frameworks. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks accessibility features and modern security practices such as HTTPS and security headers. No analytics or tracking technologies are detected, indicating minimal digital marketing or user tracking. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS and security headers is a significant concern. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or incident response information is provided. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing exposure but also limiting engagement capabilities. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires improvements to meet modern standards. The overall risk is moderate given the nature of the site as a local sports club with limited sensitive data handling. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, improving mobile and accessibility features, and providing clear contact and security incident response information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fbcliberec.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FBC Liberec operates as a small-scale sports club specializing in floorball in the Czech Republic. Its market position is local and community-focused, targeting sports enthusiasts and players in Liberec. The business model revolves around sports training, events, and player recruitment. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, sponsorships, and event participation. The website content is basic and primarily informational, with no evident e-commerce or advanced digital services. There is no indication of partnerships or subsidiaries. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal digital presence and lack of marketing tools. The club appears to maintain a straightforward operational model with a focus on local engagement.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. Key vulnerabilities include lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or security contact channels. The site does not expose sensitive data or use forms, which reduces attack surface but also limits functionality. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated. The security culture appears minimal, with no certifications or frameworks referenced. Immediate improvements are needed to secure communications and provide transparency on data handling and incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Include clear contact information and establish a security incident response contact channel.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.
  5. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FBC Liberec
Description
FBC Liberec is a sports club focused on floorball activities in Liberec, Czech Republic. The website content and metadata indicate it is related to floorball sports, training, and local sports events.
Key services
Floorball training, Sports events, Player recruitment
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a local sports club site with basic content and minimal technical sophistication.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly provided on the homepage or metadata.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data; likely HTTP or unknown SSL status.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  7. Open Graph metadata present but minimal.
  8. No social media links or contact information found.
  9. Website uses Bootstrap CSS for styling but no advanced frameworks detected.
  10. No evidence of advertising or marketing tools.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a simple technology stack using HTML5, CSS3, and Bootstrap for styling. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced JavaScript frameworks. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. The site lacks modern security features such as HTTPS and security headers. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. The site structure is straightforward but could benefit from improved SEO and accessibility features. Technical debt appears low but modernization is recommended to improve security and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fbcliberec.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fbcliberec.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.