Skip to main content

Security report for favefy.com

Favefy.com | Social Bookmarking · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Favefy.com is a social bookmarking platform that enables users to organize, save, and share web content while engaging with a community of web enthusiasts. The site offers trending stories, recent articles, and affiliate marketing links to popular cryptocurrency exchanges. Technically, it is built on WordPress with Elementor and several plugins for social media integration, analytics, and user interaction. The website is secured with HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA for registration forms, but lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the site content and structure appear professional and functional. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching favefy.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention favefy.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
193
Employees
0
Customers
193
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
5%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for favefy.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets internet users interested in content curation and social bookmarking, positioning itself as a niche community-driven service. Its business model includes affiliate marketing partnerships with major crypto exchanges, generating revenue through referrals. The content spans multiple sectors including business, education, entertainment, and technology, appealing to a broad audience of web explorers and content creators. The site is relatively small in scale, with no clear parent or subsidiary companies identified. The presence of privacy and terms policies indicates some level of operational maturity, but the lack of direct contact details and WHOIS transparency may impact trust and growth potential.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to protect user registration, which are positive security measures. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the absence of a cookie consent mechanism and minimal privacy compliance reduce its security posture. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen web security.
  2. Add a clear cookie policy and consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR.
  3. Verify and publish WHOIS registration details to improve domain legitimacy and user trust.
  4. Enhance contact information availability with verified company emails and phone numbers for better transparency.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Favefy.com | Social Bookmarking
Description
Favefy is a social bookmarking platform designed for web users to organize, save, and share favorite web content, with community engagement features and trending stories.
Key services
Social bookmarking, Content sharing, Community engagement, Trending stories, Affiliate marketing referrals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google Adsense, Elementor, Ultimate Social Media Icons plugin, Upvote plugin, Contact Form 7, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA on registration form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based social bookmarking platform with community features.
  2. Content is diverse, covering business, education, entertainment, and technology topics.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  4. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present but cookie policy and consent mechanisms are minimal or absent.
  5. Use of Google Adsense and affiliate marketing links is evident.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  8. WHOIS data missing, raising domain legitimacy concerns.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and several plugins for social media, analytics, and user engagement. It integrates Google Analytics and Adsense for tracking and monetization. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and use of CDN-hosted fonts. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some security best practices. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small to medium content platform but can benefit from security and compliance upgrades.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with favefy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review favefy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.