Skip to main content

Security report for faster.cz

Faster.cz · Telecommunications · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Faster.cz is a Czech-based telecommunications and technology company specializing in internet services, data center operations, voice (VoIP) services, and cybersecurity. The company operates its own optical network in Brno with continuous 24/7/365 monitoring, targeting ISP providers and businesses requiring reliable connectivity and security solutions. The website reflects a professional B2B service provider with a clear market position in the regional telecommunications sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO and multilingual support, and it employs Google services for analytics and advertising with GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent management, though explicit security headers and incident response information are lacking. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trust but the website content and branding are consistent and professional. Overall, Faster.cz presents a credible and mature digital presence suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching faster.cz

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
33
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company has been operational since 1994, indicating long-standing experience in internet services. Its business model focuses on wholesale and enterprise-grade services including data center hosting and cybersecurity, serving primarily ISP and business customers. The presence of a multilingual website and professional branding suggests a focus on regional and possibly international clients. The partnership with mevia.cz for website development indicates collaboration with specialized digital agencies. Advertising and analytics are managed through Google platforms, reflecting standard industry practices. The lack of visible contact details on the homepage may indicate a preference for client portal or direct business communication channels. The company’s market position is strengthened by owning its optical network and providing 24/7 monitoring, which are competitive advantages in the telecommunications sector.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a robust cookie consent management system (tarteaucitron.js) with Google Consent Mode enabled, demonstrating compliance with GDPR and privacy best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap that could be addressed to enhance security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which is a common shortfall but important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The security score is good but could be improved with additional headers and published security policies. The lack of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy but does not directly impact website security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust with clients.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Include clear and accessible contact information (emails, phone numbers) on the website to improve business credibility and customer support.
  5. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trustworthiness and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Faster.cz
Description
Internetové služby, datové centrum, hlasové VoIP služby a kybernetická bezpečnost. Vlastní optická síť v Brně s dohledem 24/7/365. Velkoobchodní služby pro ISP.
Key services
Internetové služby, Datové centrum, Hlasové služby, Kybernetická bezpečnost
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, WPML (multilingual), jQuery 3.7.1, tarteaucitron.js (cookie consent), Google Analytics (GA4), Google Tag Manager, Google Ads
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Google Consent Mode enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (GA4)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (GA4)
Marketing tools
Google Consent Mode, tarteaucitron.js
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses modern cookie consent management with GDPR compliance.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO and multilingual support.
  6. Advertising and analytics are managed via Google services with consent.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response info published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Content is professional, relevant, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 with Yoast SEO and WPML plugins, indicating a mature CMS setup with multilingual capabilities. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and tarteaucitron.js for cookie consent management, integrating Google Analytics (GA4), Google Tag Manager, and Google Ads with consent mode enabled. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with preloaded fonts and asynchronous script loading. No major technical debt or outdated libraries were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features but meets basic standards. Overall, the technical implementation is solid and supports the business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with faster.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review faster.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.