Skip to main content

Security report for fasa.eu

FASA- Packaging Technology · Manufacturing · Lithuania

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FASA- Packaging Technology is a medium-sized manufacturing company based in Lithuania, specializing in food processing machinery and packaging solutions for dairy products such as butter, yogurt, cheese, and spreads. Established in 1959, the company positions itself as a leader in the dairy packaging machinery sector. Their website reflects a professional digital presence built on WordPress with modern plugins and SEO optimizations, targeting food industry professionals and packaging solution buyers. The technical infrastructure is solid, leveraging Elementor for design and CleanTalk for anti-spam protection, with Google Tag Manager integrated for analytics and marketing. From a security perspective, the website benefits from HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR principles. However, the absence of a publicly accessible privacy policy, terms of service, and explicit contact information limits full compliance and transparency. No security headers were detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, indicating room for improvement in security posture and compliance documentation. Overall, the website is functional, well-designed, and moderately secure, but the lack of critical compliance documents and contact details introduces some risk. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents. These steps will improve trustworthiness, compliance, and resilience against potential threats.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fasa.eu

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
95
Average
60
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fasa.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for fasa.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FASA operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on food processing and packaging machinery, particularly for dairy products. Their long-standing market presence since 1959 suggests a stable business with established expertise. The business model revolves around manufacturing and selling specialized machinery, targeting industrial clients in the food sector. The website's multilingual support indicates an international or European market reach. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Google Tag Manager but lacks visible direct contact points or certifications on the site. Growth opportunities may lie in expanding digital transparency and compliance to enhance customer trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and anti-spam measures in place. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and others reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which may hinder timely handling of security incidents. The cookie consent mechanism is a positive indicator of GDPR awareness, but the missing privacy policy and terms of service represent compliance gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements in policy transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add a clear terms of service page outlining user obligations and company liabilities.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen technical security.
  4. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FASA- Packaging Technology
Description
Food processing machinery and equipment. Dairy products packaging leaders. Packing solutions for butter, yogurt, cheese, spread etc.
Key services
Food processing machinery, Dairy product packaging solutions, Packaging for butter, yogurt, cheese, spread
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, CleanTalk Anti-Spam, Startklar Elementor Forms Extension, Ultimate Elementor, WPForms Lite
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of CleanTalk Anti-Spam plugin
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CleanTalk pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; no registrar or dates extracted.
  3. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  4. Cookie consent is implemented via Cookiebot.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on the homepage or in metadata.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the visible content or metadata.
  7. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and SEO best practices.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts found.
  10. Business is a medium-sized manufacturing company specializing in food processing machinery and packaging solutions.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Elementor page builder and several plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization, CleanTalk for anti-spam protection, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) implemented for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with external dependencies on Google Fonts and YouTube scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fasa.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fasa.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.