Skip to main content

Security report for farmi.ee

AS Farmi Piimatööstus · Manufacturing · Estonia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

AS Farmi Piimatööstus operates as an Estonian dairy product manufacturer with a well-established online presence since at least 2010. The website serves as a platform to showcase their products, recipes, and company information, targeting consumers interested in dairy goods. The company maintains active engagement through social media channels and provides clear contact details, reinforcing its market position as a reputable local manufacturer. Technically, the website is built on the Voog CMS platform, utilizing modern web technologies including jQuery, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, although accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts enhancing user experience. From a security perspective, the site employs HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security headers and formal security policies, which could be improved. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, indicating room for maturity in security governance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with a solid business foundation. Strategic improvements in security policies, privacy transparency, and accessibility would enhance compliance and user trust, supporting long-term digital resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching farmi.ee

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a medium-sized manufacturer and retailer in the dairy sector within Estonia. Its business model focuses on producing and marketing dairy products directly to consumers, supported by recipe content and active social media engagement. The domain age and consistent branding indicate stability and market presence. The company leverages digital marketing tools to maintain customer relationships and brand awareness. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation. The website content and external links reflect a focused ecosystem around dairy products and consumer engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data leakage is observed. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. The lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms limits transparency and preparedness. Third-party scripts are used extensively, which requires ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. Enhancing security governance and implementing best practices would reduce risk and improve compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen site security.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
AS Farmi Piimatööstus
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
AS Farmi Piimatööstus
Description
Eesti piimatoodete valmistaja (Estonian dairy products manufacturer)
Key services
Production of dairy products, Providing recipes, Engagement via blog and social media
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Voog CMS, Cookie Script
Platforms
Voog CMS platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via third-party script
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools
  6. No visible security policy or incident response information
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  8. Good branding and consistent design
  9. Content is relevant and targeted to dairy product consumers
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses the Voog CMS platform, supported by jQuery and asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Hosting appears to be managed by Telia Eesti AS, consistent with the registrar information. Performance is moderate, with no critical technical debt observed. Opportunities exist to improve accessibility and implement security headers. The use of third-party cookie consent scripts indicates awareness of privacy requirements, though further enhancements are needed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with farmi.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review farmi.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.