Skip to main content

Security report for farmerclinecampbell.com

Farmer, Cline & Campbell Personal Injury Lawyers · Other · United States

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Farmer, Cline & Campbell Personal Injury Lawyers is a well-established personal injury law firm based in Charleston, West Virginia, with nearly 30 years of experience and over 300 years of combined attorney experience. The firm specializes in a wide range of personal injury cases including vehicle accidents, catastrophic injuries, and wrongful death. They have a strong market position supported by numerous legal awards, certifications, and a large volume of positive client reviews. Their business model focuses on providing expert legal representation to injured individuals in West Virginia, offering free consultations and emphasizing client trust and success. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern performance optimizations such as NitroPack, and integrates popular tools like Gravity Forms and Google Analytics. The site is mobile-optimized, fast-loading, and professionally designed, providing an excellent user experience. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA protections, though it lacks some advanced security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website reflects a credible and professional legal service provider with strong business credibility but could improve privacy transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching farmerclinecampbell.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm holds a strong competitive advantage in the West Virginia personal injury legal market, leveraging extensive experience, a broad service portfolio, and high-profile recognitions. Their revenue streams likely derive from contingency fees on personal injury settlements and verdicts. The target customer segment is injury victims in West Virginia seeking legal assistance. The firm maintains a robust partnership ecosystem with legal rating organizations and uses multiple digital marketing and analytics tools to support client acquisition. Growth indicators include a large number of positive reviews and video testimonials. The firm's operations appear mature with a focus on client trust and legal excellence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from spam. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap in best practices. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No public incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are found, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be enhanced to reduce risk and improve compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Farmer, Cline & Campbell Personal Injury Lawyers
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Farmer, Cline & Campbell Personal Injury Lawyers
Description
Farmer, Cline & Campbell Personal Injury Lawyers is a personal injury law firm in Charleston, West Virginia, with over 300 years of combined experience helping injury victims. They have recovered hundreds of millions in settlements and verdicts and offer free consultations.
Key services
Personal injury legal representation, Car accident law, Truck accident law, Motorcycle accident law, Pedestrian accident law, Brain injury law, Catastrophic injury law, Premises liability, Slip and fall, Wrongful death
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Gravity Forms, NitroPack, Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, ClickCease, Trustindex.io
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of reCAPTCHA v3 on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of iframe sandboxing for form submissions

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, The Trade Desk
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
ClickCease, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
The Trade Desk (TTDUniversalPixelApi)
Marketing tools
Gravity Forms, NitroPack
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional legal services site specializing in personal injury law in West Virginia.
  2. Content is rich with detailed service descriptions, case results, client testimonials, and video testimonials.
  3. Strong trust signals from multiple legal industry recognitions and client reviews.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization via NitroPack.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels including phone, email, and contact forms.
  6. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the homepage content provided.
  7. Security posture is good but could be improved with additional HTTP security headers and DNSSEC.
  8. No signs of adult or inappropriate content; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing Gravity Forms for data collection and NitroPack for performance optimization. It uses Google Fonts for typography and integrates Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is hosted likely via GoDaddy given the registrar and nameservers. Performance is optimized with lazy loading and preloading techniques. The site is mobile responsive and accessible with good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of DNSSEC. The infrastructure is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and explicit privacy compliance implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with farmerclinecampbell.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review farmerclinecampbell.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.