Skip to main content

Security report for fanettemellier.com

Fanette Mellier · Other · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fanette Mellier's website serves as a professional portfolio showcasing graphic design and printed matter projects, including exhibitions, books, and objects. The business appears to be a small creative entity based in France, with a domain registered since 2006, indicating a well-established presence. The site content is rich in artistic projects and external references to partner sites and social media, targeting a general audience interested in graphic arts. Technically, the website uses modern web standards with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, hosted on alwaysdata.com with HTTPS enabled, ensuring secure access. However, the absence of security headers and DNSSEC indicates room for improvement in security hardening. Privacy and compliance features are lacking, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, GDPR compliance statements, or contact information, which could pose compliance risks. Overall, the site is professionally designed with good user experience but requires enhancements in privacy, security policies, and contact transparency to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fanettemellier.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Fanette Mellier as a niche graphic designer and artist specializing in printed matter and visual identity projects. The business model revolves around creative services and product sales, including books and objects, supported by exhibitions and collaborations with notable partners such as Hermès. The target customers are likely art enthusiasts, collectors, and institutions interested in graphic design. The domain age and consistent branding suggest stable operations. The external links to partner and commercial sites indicate a collaborative ecosystem. However, the lack of explicit business contact details and compliance documentation may limit broader commercial engagement and trust from institutional clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. No forms or data collection mechanisms were detected, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to secure DNS resolution and prevent spoofing.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and incident reporting.
  5. Consider establishing a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to improve security transparency and incident response readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fanette Mellier
Description
Design graphique et objets imprimés / Graphic design and printed matter
Key services
graphic design, printed matter, exhibitions, books, objects
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, SVG
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a portfolio and project showcase for graphic designer Fanette Mellier.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the homepage or main navigation.
  4. Site uses HTTPS and is hosted on alwaysdata.com.
  5. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  7. External links mostly point to partner or related artistic and commercial sites.
  8. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  9. Site content is artistic and non-commercial in nature, focusing on exhibitions, books, and objects.
  10. No signs of advertising or affiliate marketing.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and SVG for graphics. It is hosted on alwaysdata.com, a known hosting provider. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images. No CMS or major frameworks were detected, indicating a custom or static site approach. Accessibility features are basic but present. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts suggests minimal user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a portfolio site but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fanettemellier.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fanettemellier.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.