Skip to main content

Security report for fan.ke

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fan.ke is a newly registered domain primarily serving as a parked domain with advertising content. It lacks substantive business information, contact details, or user engagement features. The site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript technologies with integration of Google Adsense and Bodis advertising networks. The technical infrastructure is minimal and hosted via Dynadot INC, consistent with domain parking services. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and DNSSEC not enabled. Privacy compliance is limited with a basic privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site presents low business credibility and minimal content quality, suitable only as a placeholder domain. Strategic recommendations include improving security headers, implementing privacy and cookie consent mechanisms, and adding business contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fan.ke

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

fan.ke operates as a domain parking service with monetization through advertising networks such as Google Adsense and Bodis. The business model focuses on generating revenue from ad clicks rather than providing direct services or products. The domain is very new, indicating no established market presence or competitive positioning. There are no partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company information available. The target audience is general internet users who may visit the parked domain. The lack of business details and contact information limits the ability to assess growth potential or strategic partnerships.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a positive security baseline. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. DNSSEC is not enabled, leaving DNS queries vulnerable to spoofing. No forms or user inputs are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user interaction. Privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent mechanism and a basic privacy policy that does not explicitly address GDPR requirements. Incident response and security policy information are absent, indicating low security maturity. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement essential security headers to protect against common web attacks.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations such as GDPR.
  4. Enhance the privacy policy to explicitly address data protection and user rights.
  5. Provide clear contact information and incident response details to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website appears to be a parked domain or placeholder with relevant content and ads.
Key services
domain parking, advertising
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Bodis Ads, Dynadot DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Bodis
Tracking pixels
Google Adsense cookie.js
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain with minimal content.
  2. No contact information or business details provided.
  3. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  4. Security headers are missing; DNSSEC not enabled.
  5. Advertising is the primary content with Google Adsense and Bodis ads.
  6. No forms or user input fields detected.
  7. No social media or external business links found.
  8. WHOIS data shows recent registration with Dynadot INC.
  9. No evidence of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript without use of advanced frameworks or CMS platforms. Advertising scripts from Google Adsense and Bodis are integrated for monetization. The hosting provider is Dynadot INC, a domain registrar and parking service. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with minimal responsive design features. SEO optimization is limited to basic meta tags without structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks forms or interactive elements, reducing complexity but also limiting functionality. Technical debt is low due to minimal features but modernization opportunities exist to improve user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fan.ke. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fan.ke.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.