Skip to main content

Security report for faltcom.se

Exreme security solutions AB · Telecommunications · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

29/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Exreme security solutions AB operates under the Fältcom brand, specializing in emergency communication solutions for lifts. The company targets lift operators and building managers across Europe, offering products such as autodialers, LTE gateways, and accessories. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, with clear product offerings and a contact form for inquiries. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 6.8.1, uses modern fonts, and integrates Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and spam protection, but lacks security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data confirms the legitimacy of the domain and its alignment with the business entity in Sweden. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching faltcom.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
29

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company occupies a niche market in telecommunications focused on emergency lift communication solutions. Its business model is B2B, relying on partnerships across Europe to provide localized support. The website content suggests a small-sized company with a focused product line. The absence of social media links or extensive marketing tools indicates a targeted, possibly low-volume sales approach. The partnership ecosystem is implied but not explicitly detailed. The company’s market position appears stable within its niche, with potential growth opportunities through enhanced digital presence and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 is implemented on the contact form to mitigate spam. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and readiness perception. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Compliance with GDPR is not clearly addressed, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved with policy publication and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure security headers to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response contact channel and vulnerability disclosure policy.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency by adding data retention policies and security best practices on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Exreme security solutions AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Exreme security solutions AB
Description
A company that produces emergency communication solutions for lifts under the Fältcom brand with partners across Europe supporting local languages.
Key services
Emergency communication devices, Autodialers, LTE gateways, Accessories for communication solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, PHP, Contact Form 7 plugin, Google reCAPTCHA v3, Manrope font, Fira Code font
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 on contact form

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google reCAPTCHA
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap
  3. Contact form uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  5. Content is professionally presented and relevant to emergency communication solutions
  6. No social media or email contact addresses explicitly published
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform (version 6.8.1) with standard plugins such as Contact Form 7 and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for spam protection. The use of variable fonts (Manrope and Fira Code) indicates attention to design and performance. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. However, the lack of security headers and privacy-related pages indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with faltcom.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review faltcom.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.