Skip to main content

Security report for facials4k.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Facials4k.com is a niche adult content website specializing in providing facial videos in 4K HD quality. The site appears to target adult users interested in high-resolution facial video content. The business model likely revolves around content streaming or subscription services, although explicit monetization details are not evident from the provided data. The website was registered in 2014, indicating a stable presence in its niche market. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including the Nuxt.js framework and Tailwind CSS for styling, hosted on Amazon AWS infrastructure. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies were found, which is a compliance gap. Contact and incident response information are also absent, reducing transparency and trust. Overall, the site is functional but lacks comprehensive privacy and security practices, which could impact user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching facials4k.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention facials4k.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
105
Employees
0
Customers
105
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
13%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for facials4k.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the adult entertainment sector, focusing on a specific content type (facial videos in 4K). Its market position is niche with limited direct competition in this exact segment. The business model likely includes paid access or subscriptions, although no explicit payment or membership information was detected. The target audience is adult consumers seeking high-quality video content. The site does not display clear partnership or subsidiary relationships. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not publicly visible. The lack of contact information and policies suggests a low emphasis on corporate transparency. The site’s branding is moderately consistent but lacks strong trust signals such as certifications or testimonials.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks DNSSEC, which could expose DNS queries to spoofing. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are published, indicating limited security governance transparency. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and similar regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts were found, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved by implementing standard security headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing relevant policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to improve protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish clear contact information including an incident response or abuse contact email to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure and security incident response policies to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website offering facial videos in 4K HD resolution.
Key services
4K HD facial videos
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Font Awesome, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Nuxt.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the content.
  4. No security or incident response policies or contact channels identified.
  5. Website uses modern CSS framework (Tailwind) and Nuxt.js framework.
  6. Hosting is via Amazon AWS DNS services.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. No social media or external business partner links found.
  9. Website content and design are basic with minimal trust indicators.
  10. Domain WHOIS data is publicly available and consistent with website age.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Nuxt.js framework, a modern Vue.js-based framework, combined with Tailwind CSS for styling and Font Awesome for icons. Hosting is managed via Amazon AWS DNS services, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO meta tags. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based site. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but no advanced optimizations detected. Accessibility features are basic, with some semantic HTML elements present but no advanced ARIA roles or landmarks detected. The site lacks advanced analytics or marketing tools, which may limit business insights but also reduces privacy concerns. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with facials4k.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review facials4k.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.