Skip to main content

Security report for face-fuck.com

NameSilo, LLC (registrar) · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Face-Fuck.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in hardcore face fucking and rough deepthroat porn videos. The site operates as a free porn tube platform, offering streaming content and linking to multiple affiliate adult sites. The business model relies on free content consumption and affiliate marketing partnerships within the adult niche. The website targets an adults-only audience with explicit content and age warnings prominently displayed. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with Cloudflare DNS services but lacks advanced security configurations such as DNSSEC or security headers. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has basic SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is weak with no evident security headers and a referrer policy that may expose user privacy. The domain WHOIS data is suspicious, showing a future creation date and minimal registrant information, which raises concerns about legitimacy and trustworthiness. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations. Contact information is minimal, limited to a generic email address in the footer. Overall, the website presents significant risks in terms of security, privacy compliance, and business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching face-fuck.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche segment in the adult entertainment market focusing on hardcore face fucking content. It leverages affiliate marketing by linking to multiple related adult sites, suggesting revenue generation through referrals. The lack of clear business entity information and suspicious domain registration details indicate a low level of corporate transparency. The target customer segment is adults seeking explicit pornographic content. The site appears to be small in scale with basic content quality and limited branding consistency. Partnerships with various adult affiliate domains form its ecosystem, but no formal certifications or trust signals are present. Growth indicators and strategic positioning are unclear due to minimal business disclosures.

Security posture

The security maturity of Face-Fuck.com is low. The absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and a secure referrer policy exposes users to potential privacy and security risks. The domain registration data is inconsistent and suspicious, undermining trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The site lacks GDPR compliance indicators and does not provide privacy or cookie policies, which is a compliance gap. Forms on the site collect search queries but no sensitive personal data is requested. Overall, the site is vulnerable to privacy leaks and lacks robust security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to protect users.
  3. Update the referrer policy to a safer setting to reduce privacy risks.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other data protection regulations.
  5. Improve domain registration transparency and ensure accurate WHOIS information to build trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
NameSilo, LLC (registrar)
Description
Free porn tube offering hardcore and rough deepthroat porn videos with new movies added daily.
Key services
Free streaming of adult videos, Affiliate marketing to related adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
news-byabuye.live, trck.house
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a free adult porn tube focused on hardcore face fucking content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact email present only as a generic mailto link in footer with no domain matching.
  4. No security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  5. Multiple external adult affiliate sites linked.
  6. No social media or phone contact information found.
  7. Site uses Cloudflare DNS but no DNSSEC.
  8. Referrer policy is set to unsafe-url, which is a privacy risk.
  9. No GDPR or data protection compliance indicators.
  10. Site content is explicit adult material with age warning.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript) and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. The site includes embedded video previews and uses asynchronous JavaScript for tracking and analytics from third-party domains. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices with responsive design elements. However, no modern frameworks or CMS platforms are detected. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization. The site lacks accessibility features beyond basic HTML semantics. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The technical debt includes missing security headers and outdated or unsafe referrer policies.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with face-fuck.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review face-fuck.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.