Skip to main content

Security report for exwm.cc

Other · Iceland

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Exwm.cc appears to be a small business or startup website launched in 2020, hosted behind Cloudflare and built using modern web technologies such as Next.js and Material-UI. The website content is minimal, primarily serving as a home page with limited descriptive text. The integration of the Binotel chat widget indicates a focus on customer interaction via live chat. However, the site lacks critical compliance and trust elements such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and clear contact information. The domain registration is privacy protected, which is common for small businesses but reduces transparency. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing important security headers and DNSSEC. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate technical maturity but requires improvements in compliance, transparency, and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching exwm.cc

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind exwm.cc is not clearly identified on the website or in the WHOIS data beyond privacy protection. The domain age and hosting setup suggest a relatively new and small-scale operation. The lack of detailed business information, contact details, and policies limits the ability to assess market positioning or business model. The use of a live chat widget suggests a customer service or engagement focus. No social media or partner links were found, indicating limited public partnership or marketing ecosystem. The business likely targets a general audience but specifics are not provided.

Security posture

Security maturity is basic. HTTPS is enabled, which is mandatory, but DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided data. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy indicates limited readiness for incident response or external security reporting. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified, but the lack of security headers and privacy policies represents compliance gaps. The use of privacy protection in WHOIS is common but reduces transparency. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small site but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Add clear contact information including company email and phone numbers labeled for support or sales.
  3. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  5. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Home
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Material-UI, Cloudflare, Binotel Chat Widget
Frameworks
Next.js, Material-UI
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Binotel Chat Widget
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or linked pages.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled as company contacts found in the HTML content.
  3. Website uses modern React-based framework (Next.js) and Material-UI for UI components.
  4. Binotel chat widget is integrated for live chat support.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond chat widget scripts.
  8. Website content is minimal and mostly a home page with limited textual content.
  9. No social media links or company legal information found in the HTML content.
  10. Domain WHOIS is privacy protected via NameCheap privacy service.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework (Next.js) with Material-UI for styling and components, indicating a contemporary technical stack. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing CDN and security benefits. The site loads multiple JavaScript chunks asynchronously and uses Google Fonts for typography. The integration of Binotel chat widgets adds real-time communication capabilities. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features appear basic. SEO meta tags are present but minimal. No CMS or backend platform was detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but could benefit from enhanced performance tuning and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with exwm.cc. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review exwm.cc.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.