Skip to main content

Security report for exterieursetjardin.fr

Mulhouse Expo S.A.E.M.L · Other · France

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website exterieursetjardin.fr represents a French event organizer, Mulhouse Expo S.A.E.M.L, specializing in gardening, outdoor living, and organic agriculture exhibitions. The site promotes the 'Extérieurs & Jardin' salon and the 'Ma Planète Bio' event, targeting gardening enthusiasts and the general public interested in bio and wellness. The business operates primarily as an event organizer with a regional market presence and a small company size founded in 2016. Technically, the website uses a traditional tech stack including jQuery 1.11.2, Bootstrap 3.3.4, and Revolution Slider, hosted on OCI CLOUD infrastructure. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content quality but lacks modern CMS integration and advanced SEO or accessibility features. Performance is moderate with room for improvement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as CSP and HSTS. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR. The contact information is clearly provided, but no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, suggesting minimal user tracking. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security hardening, and modernization of technical components to enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching exterieursetjardin.fr

This scan found 32 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mulhouse Expo S.A.E.M.L operates in the event management sector focusing on gardening and organic agriculture exhibitions. The company leverages partnerships with related event sites and maintains an active social media presence to engage its target audience. The business model centers on organizing and promoting regional salons with additional services such as workshops and expert consultations. The company benefits from a consistent brand identity and legal transparency but lacks advanced digital marketing and privacy compliance features. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital presence and compliance adherence.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate but incomplete. HTTPS is presumably enabled, but no security headers are detected, which exposes the site to common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies is a compliance risk under GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries may introduce security risks. Overall, the site requires implementation of security best practices including security headers, privacy notices, and secure form handling to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Upgrade JavaScript libraries and frameworks to supported, secure versions.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Mulhouse Expo S.A.E.M.L
Registration number
SIRET 409 026 770 00027
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Mulhouse Expo S.A.E.M.L
Description
Salon dédié au jardinage et aux aménagements extérieurs, combiné avec un salon bio, bien-être et agriculture bio.
Key services
Organisation de salons, Animations et ateliers, Marché aux plantes, Conférences
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 3.3.4, Revolution Slider, Custom CSS and JS
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (assumed from URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a French event site for gardening and bio agriculture.
  2. No privacy or cookie policy found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, address, and contact form.
  4. No security headers detected; security posture can be improved.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  6. Site uses older Bootstrap 3.3.4 and jQuery 1.11.2, which may have security risks if not updated.
  7. No CMS detected; likely custom built site.
  8. Social media presence is active on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram.
  9. Legal and copyright information is comprehensive and transparent.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a legacy tech stack with Bootstrap 3.3.4 and jQuery 1.11.2, which are outdated and may pose security risks. The site uses Revolution Slider for carousel features and custom CSS/JS for styling and animations. Hosting is provided by OCI CLOUD, a reputable cloud provider. The site is mobile responsive and has a clear navigation structure but lacks modern CMS or structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with potential for optimization. No analytics or tracking scripts are present, indicating minimal data collection. Technical debt is present due to outdated libraries and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with exterieursetjardin.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review exterieursetjardin.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.