Skip to main content

Security report for exoy.eu

Other · United States

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in DNS health, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at exoy.one/lander is a minimal placeholder or parking page with almost no content or business information. The domain is registered via a privacy protection service and is currently expired, which raises concerns about legitimacy and operational status. The site uses basic JavaScript and React framework scripts but lacks any meaningful metadata, forms, or contact details. There are no privacy or cookie policies, no security headers detected, and no HTTPS information available from the provided data. Overall, the site appears inactive or abandoned, with minimal technical sophistication and no visible business presence. From a technical perspective, the site relies on a parking-lander script hosted on wsimg.com and includes Google Adsense for advertising. The domain is hosted by GoDaddy.com, LLC, but the expired status and lack of DNSSEC reduce trustworthiness. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks SEO and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking services beyond Adsense are detected. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, no security headers, and an expired domain. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS obscures ownership, which combined with minimal content and expired status, suggests low trustworthiness. There are no indications of malware or phishing, but the site is not suitable for business or user engagement in its current state. Overall risk is high due to expired domain and lack of compliance or security measures. Strategic recommendations include renewing the domain, enabling HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and providing clear business and contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Critical

      Domain Expired

      Domain expired 23 days ago

      What to do: Renew domain registration immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching exoy.eu

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
35
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
63
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired · found on this site
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website does not provide any identifiable business information, branding, or services. The domain is newly created in 2023 but already expired, indicating possible abandonment or speculative registration. The use of privacy protection and minimal content suggests no active business operations. There are no indications of market positioning, revenue streams, or customer targeting. The presence of Google Adsense indicates an attempt to monetize traffic, but without content, this is likely ineffective. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. Overall, the site lacks any meaningful business intelligence data.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is poor. The domain is expired, which is a critical issue. There is no evidence of HTTPS or SSL configuration from the provided data, and no security headers are detected. The use of privacy protection for WHOIS obscures ownership, which can be a red flag in absence of legitimate business information. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing exposure but also indicating minimal engagement. Overall, the site lacks basic security best practices and compliance measures.

Recommendations

  1. Renew the domain registration immediately to avoid service disruption and improve trust.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Publish clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility.
  5. Enable security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a minimal placeholder/parking page with almost no content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present.
  4. Domain is expired but still resolving, which is suspicious.
  5. Registrant uses privacy protection service, obscuring ownership.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  7. External scripts include Google Adsense and a parking-lander script from wsimg.com.
  8. No SEO or accessibility features detected.
  9. No business or branding information visible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses React JavaScript framework and loads scripts from wsimg.com and Google Adsense. The HTML content is minimal, consisting mainly of a root div with no visible content. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level but lacks SEO meta tags, Open Graph, or structured data. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy.com, LLC. DNSSEC is not enabled, and the domain is expired. No CMS or advanced platform detected. Performance is moderate given minimal content. Accessibility and SEO optimizations are poor. The technical implementation is basic and indicative of a placeholder or parking page rather than a functional website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with exoy.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review exoy.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.