Skip to main content

Security report for eximusstudio.com

Eximus Studio · Other · N/a

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eximus Studio is a small business specializing in 3D visualization and animation services, primarily targeting clients interested in architectural visualizations. The website serves as a portfolio and blog, showcasing recent projects and tutorials related to 3D rendering. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on delivering high-quality visual content for architectural and design professionals. The market position appears niche with a focus on quality and artistic presentation. Technically, the website is built on WordPress, utilizing standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, and FontAwesome for icons. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, though accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic. No advanced frameworks or analytics tools are detected, indicating a straightforward digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS, which is a positive indicator. However, there is a lack of security headers and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, although the website content is professional and active. No forms or tracking scripts are present, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement features. Overall, the website presents a professional front for a small 3D visualization business but would benefit from enhanced security practices, privacy compliance, and clearer domain registration information to improve trustworthiness and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eximusstudio.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eximus Studio operates in the specialized sector of 3D architectural visualization and animation, catering to architects, designers, and clients requiring high-quality visual content. The business leverages a portfolio and blog format to showcase work and share tips, indicating a content marketing approach. The lack of extensive contact information and social media presence suggests a boutique or freelance operation rather than a large enterprise. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based service contracts. The company appears to maintain a focused partnership ecosystem, though no explicit partners or subsidiaries are identified. Growth indicators include recent content updates and active portfolio additions. Strategic observations recommend formalizing privacy and security policies and enhancing digital presence for broader market reach.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is implemented, ensuring encrypted communications. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes the site to potential risks like clickjacking and MIME sniffing. No incident response or security policy information is provided, limiting transparency and preparedness. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The security culture appears minimal, with no visible indicators of proactive security management. Enhancing security headers, publishing privacy policies, and establishing incident response contacts are recommended to improve security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and build user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish clear contact information for incident response and security inquiries to enhance transparency.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  5. Consider integrating analytics and performance monitoring tools to better understand user behavior and optimize site performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eximus Studio
Description
3D visualisation & animation company
Key services
3D visualisation, Animation, Architectural rendering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, FontAwesome, HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based 3D visualization and animation portfolio/blog
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. Contact email provided in blog post content only
  4. No phone numbers or social media links detected
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content
  6. HTTPS is used
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  8. No forms present on the homepage
  9. Content is in English and Latvian (some blog content in Latvian)
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found in HTML head
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS version 6.5.5, using standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. FontAwesome is used for iconography. The site loads emoji support scripts from WordPress core. The HTML structure is valid and includes responsive meta tags for mobile optimization. No advanced JavaScript frameworks or analytics tools are detected. Performance is moderate with no evident heavy scripts or external dependencies beyond FontAwesome and WordPress core assets. Accessibility features are basic, with some semantic HTML usage but no ARIA landmarks or roles detected. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords present but no Open Graph or structured data markup. Hosting provider and server details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small WordPress-based portfolio site with room for modernization and enhancement.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eximusstudio.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eximusstudio.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.