Skip to main content

Security report for exgirlfriendmy.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ww1.exgirlfriendmy.com is a parked domain page primarily serving as a placeholder with a link to purchase the domain via Sedo. There is no substantive business content, contact information, or branding present. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating either a very recent registration or a subdomain without independent registration. The technical infrastructure is minimal, relying on basic JavaScript and CSS assets from a parking service provider. Security posture is weak due to lack of visible HTTPS enforcement and absence of security headers. Privacy compliance is minimal with only a basic privacy policy placeholder link and no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site lacks credibility and trust indicators, and the content suggests an adult/dating theme based on the domain name but without explicit content or services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching exgirlfriendmy.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

This domain appears to be held for resale and does not represent an active business entity. There are no indications of operational business activities, revenue streams, or customer engagement mechanisms. The domain's market positioning is unclear, and no partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The business model is limited to domain parking and potential resale. The lack of contact or company information further reduces credibility and suggests the domain is not currently used for legitimate commercial purposes.

Security posture

The security posture of the site is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No forms or user input fields are present, reducing attack surface but also indicating no active user engagement. The absence of WHOIS data and registrant information raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential abuse. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. Overall, the site does not follow best security practices and should be treated with caution.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS and ensure SSL certificates are properly configured.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  3. Publish verifiable contact information to improve trust and compliance.
  4. Implement security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider removing or developing the domain beyond parking to establish legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is a domain parking page for exgirlfriendmy.com, offering the domain for sale via Sedo.
Key services
Domain sale listing
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is a parked domain page with minimal content.
  2. No business or contact information provided.
  3. No HTTPS or security headers visible in provided data.
  4. Privacy policy link present but leads to placeholder.
  5. No forms or data collection elements found.
  6. External links primarily to Sedo domain marketplace and Google Adsense.
  7. Content suggests adult/dating theme but no explicit content shown.
  8. No social media or company branding detected.
  9. No WHOIS data available for domain or subdomain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic JavaScript and CSS assets loaded from a parking service provider (Sedo). The HTML structure is minimal and lacks modern SEO or accessibility features. There is no CMS or advanced framework detected beyond basic React-like root div usage. Performance is moderate given the minimal content. Mobile optimization is basic but present. The site relies on external scripts from Google Adsense and TrustArc for consent management, but no active cookie consent banner is visible. The technical debt is low due to minimal implementation but also indicates lack of investment in site development.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with exgirlfriendmy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review exgirlfriendmy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.