Skip to main content

Security report for evolution.com

Evolution AB (publ) · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Evolution AB (publ) is a leading enterprise specializing in providing B2B online casino technology solutions, including live casino, game shows, slots, and other gaming products. The company holds multiple industry licenses and certifications, positioning itself as a market leader in the online gaming technology sector. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content targeting casino operators and gaming businesses globally. The technical infrastructure is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and plugins, ensuring good performance, mobile optimization, and SEO compliance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, though some security headers and explicit security policies could be enhanced. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall legitimacy given the company's market presence and certifications. Strategic recommendations include improving security header implementation, publishing security policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure channels to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching evolution.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Evolution operates in the technology sector, specifically focusing on online casino software solutions for B2B clients. Their business model revolves around licensing and providing gaming content and platforms to casino operators worldwide. The company has a strong partnership ecosystem, including subsidiaries such as NetEnt, Red Tiger, and Ezugi, enhancing their market reach and product diversity. The website showcases a large enterprise with a professional brand image, extensive client logos, and active social media engagement. Growth indicators include recent news about partnerships and product launches. The company maintains compliance with multiple regulatory bodies, reinforcing its credibility in a highly regulated industry.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent management in place. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and others suggests room for improvement. No direct security contact or incident response information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The absence of a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file limits transparency for security researchers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a public-facing corporate site but could be enhanced to meet best practices and regulatory expectations fully.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide clear incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Establish and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance contact information with direct emails or phone numbers for security and compliance inquiries.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Evolution AB (publ)
Description
Evolution is a leading B2B solution provider for casino operators offering live casino, live game shows, slots and more.
Key services
live casino, live game shows, slots, first person games, live blackjack, live roulette, live baccarat, super sic bo & dragon tiger, live poker, land based dual play
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bootstrap 4.6, jQuery 3.6.0, Owl Carousel, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Yoast SEO Premium, Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy plugins

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well maintained.
  2. Strong focus on online casino B2B solutions.
  3. Multiple industry certifications and licenses displayed.
  4. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies with consent management.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers publicly listed; contact via form only.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual for a large company domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using Bootstrap 4.6 for responsive design and jQuery 3.6.0 for client-side scripting. It employs popular plugins such as Yoast SEO Premium for search engine optimization and Complianz GDPR/CCPA for cookie consent management, indicating a focus on privacy compliance. The site uses Owl Carousel and AOS for interactive and animated UI elements. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, though hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The site leverages Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking, integrated with consent management to respect user privacy preferences.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100 −1Medium28 findingsView report
  2. 71/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with evolution.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review evolution.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.