Skip to main content

Security report for evmos.org

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at evmos.org currently serves only a 404 error page hosted on GitHub Pages, indicating that the actual website content is missing or not deployed. There is no visible business information, contact details, or policies, which severely limits the ability to assess the company's operations or market position. The domain is registered through NameCheap, Inc. since 2021 and is valid until 2026, but the lack of content suggests the site is either under development or abandoned. Technically, the site is hosted on GitHub Pages with minimal security headers such as Content-Security-Policy. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or DNSSEC enabled, and no analytics or tracking technologies are present. The site’s performance and SEO are poor due to the absence of content and metadata. From a security perspective, the site shows basic security header implementation but lacks critical protections like HTTPS and DNSSEC. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, and no contact or incident response information is available. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy-protected, which is typical for a standard domain but does not compensate for the lack of website content. Overall, the website is currently non-functional from a user and business perspective, with a low trust and professionalism rating. Strategic recommendations include deploying actual website content, enabling HTTPS and DNSSEC, adding privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact and business information to improve credibility and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching evmos.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of website content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a relatively recent registration in 2021, which aligns with a technology or blockchain project timeline. However, no information about market positioning, competitive advantages, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The lack of contact details and policies indicates the site is not currently operational or publicly engaging with customers or partners.

Security posture

The security posture is minimal with only a Content-Security-Policy header detected. There is no information about HTTPS enforcement or SSL configuration, and DNSSEC is not enabled. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are present. The site is vulnerable to common web security risks due to missing protections and lack of active content. The domain status clientTransferProhibited is a positive indicator but insufficient to mitigate the overall weak security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Deploy a functional website with relevant business content to replace the 404 error page.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enable DNSSEC for domain security.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Enhance security headers by adding HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Platforms
GitHub Pages
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Content-Security-Policy header present

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is inaccessible, showing a 404 error page from GitHub Pages.
  2. No business or contact information is present on the page.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  5. Minimal security headers present; no HTTPS or SSL details available from provided data.
  6. Domain registration is valid and consistent but website is not deployed.
  7. No analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies detected.
  8. No social media or external business-related links except GitHub and Twitter status pages.
  9. Content safety is rated safe due to lack of content.
  10. Overall website quality and professionalism are poor due to missing content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on GitHub Pages, which provides a reliable platform but currently only serves a 404 error page. The HTML includes a Content-Security-Policy header restricting resource loading, but no other modern technologies or frameworks are detected. There is no evidence of CMS usage or analytics tools. The site lacks SEO meta tags and structured data, limiting search engine visibility. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic due to minimal content. Performance is moderate given the simple page but irrelevant without actual content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with evmos.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review evmos.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.