Skip to main content

Security report for eviview.com

EviView · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EviView is a specialized B2B SaaS provider offering a digital daily management system tailored for manufacturing and operational excellence teams, particularly in pharmaceutical, biotech, chemical, food and beverage, and energy sectors. The platform emphasizes digitizing workflows, improving collaboration, and enabling data-driven decision-making. The website demonstrates a mature digital presence with modern technologies such as WordPress, Elementor, Bootstrap, and integration with HubSpot and Google analytics tools. Security is well addressed with HTTPS, reCAPTCHA Enterprise, and client-specific single-tenant VPCs with SSO authentication. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, though terms of service and incident response policies are not explicitly found. Overall, the site projects professionalism, trustworthiness, and a strong market position with global blue-chip clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eviview.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EviView targets operational teams in manufacturing industries requiring digital transformation and operational efficiency. Their modular platform supports shift handovers, analytics, continuous improvement, and compliance workflows. The company leverages a SaaS model with customization and dedicated account management, serving global clients including major pharmaceutical companies. The website content and testimonials reinforce their market credibility and client satisfaction. The absence of explicit revenue or founding year limits deeper financial insights, but the presence of global clients and detailed service offerings indicate a stable and growing business.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise to protect forms from abuse. Security best practices include single-tenant VPC deployment and SSO over SAML for client authentication. However, some common security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not explicitly detected and should be implemented to enhance security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The lack of a published incident response contact or security.txt file is a gap in transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be improved with additional headers and disclosure policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options HTTP headers to strengthen security.
  2. Publish a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  3. Add an incident response contact or security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider providing direct company contact emails and phone numbers for enhanced trust and communication.
  5. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to maintain GDPR compliance and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EviView
Description
EviView provides a digital daily management system designed to transform manufacturing operations by digitizing workflows, improving collaboration, and enabling data-driven decisions. The platform targets operational excellence teams in manufacturing sectors including pharmaceutical, biotech, chemical, food and beverage, and energy industries.
Key services
Digital Shift Handover, Manufacturing Analytics, Continuous Improvement, Milestone and Activity Tracker, Root Cause Analysis (RCA), Environmental Health and Safety (EHS), Audit Management, Tier Boards
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.25.4, Bootstrap 5, Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise, HubSpot Forms, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google Tag Manager, AOS (Animate On Scroll), jQuery 3.7.1
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA Enterprise for forms
  • Single-tenant VPC with client SSO over SAML
  • No exposed sensitive data detected in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
HubSpot Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
HubSpot Ads Pixel
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, HubSpot Analytics
Marketing tools
HubSpot Forms
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, professional, and targeted at manufacturing operational teams.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and marketing/analytics tools.
  4. Security posture is good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA Enterprise implemented.
  5. No explicit terms of service found, which is a minor gap.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear comprehensive.
  7. Contact information is primarily via forms; no explicit emails or phone numbers found.
  8. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  9. WHOIS data is privacy protected but consistent with business type.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with Elementor page builder and Bootstrap framework, ensuring responsive design and modern UI. It integrates multiple third-party services including HubSpot for marketing automation and forms, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and LinkedIn Insight Tag for retargeting. The site loads moderately fast with deferred JavaScript and optimized CSS. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and structured data (JSON-LD). The technical stack is mature and well maintained, supporting a professional digital presence suitable for a B2B SaaS company.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eviview.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eviview.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.