Skip to main content

Security report for eversheds-sutherland.com

Eversheds Sutherland · Other · N/a

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

84/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eversheds Sutherland is a prominent global law firm offering a wide range of commercial legal services to clients worldwide. The firm positions itself as purposeful and purpose-led, focusing on helping clients, employees, and communities thrive. Their website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive service descriptions across multiple sectors including banking, finance, construction, corporate law, and data privacy. The firm targets corporate and business clients seeking international legal expertise. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as React and integrates advanced analytics platforms including Piwik PRO, Siteimprove, and Demandbase. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices, accessible, and SEO-friendly, indicating a high level of digital maturity. Security best practices are observed with HTTPS enforcement and robust security headers, though explicit security policy and incident response information are not publicly detailed. From a security perspective, the site demonstrates a strong posture with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data introduces a slight uncertainty in domain legitimacy, though the professional nature of the site and trust indicators mitigate concerns. Overall, Eversheds Sutherland's website is a secure, professional, and comprehensive platform that effectively supports its global legal services business. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies and improving transparency around domain registration details to enhance trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eversheds-sutherland.com

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
100
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
84

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate eversheds-sutherland.com and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
9
Registered
9
Resolving
9
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-08-09

Masked preview

  • ev•••••••••••••••••.comMediumomission
  • ev•••••••••••••••••.comMediumomission
  • ev•••••••••••••••••.comMediumomission

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of eversheds-sutherland.com with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eversheds Sutherland operates as a large enterprise law firm with a global footprint, serving diverse sectors such as banking, energy, transport, real estate, and technology. Their business model centers on providing specialized legal advice and services to corporate clients internationally. The firm leverages a strong brand presence and comprehensive service offerings to maintain a competitive advantage in the legal market. Their partnership ecosystem includes integrations with analytics and marketing platforms to support client engagement and business development. Growth indicators include a broad service portfolio and multi-language website support. The firm's operations reflect a mature and well-structured organization with a focus on compliance and client service excellence.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, including Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms are comprehensive and GDPR-aligned. However, the absence of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency. No vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file was found, which could be improved to enhance security culture and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security maturity is high but could benefit from increased transparency and formalized disclosure processes.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security frameworks and practices.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information and procedures on the website.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance transparency around domain registration details to improve trust.
  5. Continue to monitor and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to mitigate supply chain risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Eversheds Sutherland
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eversheds Sutherland
Description
Eversheds Sutherland is a global law firm providing commercial and pragmatic advice to clients around the world. As a responsible business, they are purposeful and purpose-led, helping clients, people and communities to thrive.
Key services
Banking and Finance, Competition, Trade and Foreign Investment, Construction and Engineering, Corporate and M&A, Corporate Crime, Data Privacy, Security and Technology, Employment, Labor and Pensions
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Piwik PRO Analytics, Demandbase, Siteimprove Analytics
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected
  • Secure forms with no visible vulnerabilities

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piwik PRO, Siteimprove Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, Demandbase
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity, Piwik PRO, Demandbase
Marketing tools
Demandbase, Siteimprove Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Professional global law firm site with extensive service offerings.
  3. Strong privacy and cookie compliance with consent mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual but not uncommon for large firms using privacy protection.
  7. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React, indicating a modern frontend framework choice. It integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Piwik PRO, Siteimprove, Demandbase, and Microsoft Clarity, supporting data-driven decision making. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and structured data. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by the number of external scripts and tracking pixels. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are not disclosed. Technical risks include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust and supports the firm's global business needs effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eversheds-sutherland.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eversheds-sutherland.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.