Skip to main content

Security report for eventfrog.ch

Eventfrog · Other · Switzerland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eventfrog is a Switzerland-based event calendar and ticket sales platform, positioning itself as the largest event calendar in the country with over 25,000 published events. The platform enables users to discover events and sell tickets easily and free of charge, targeting a broad general audience interested in events and parties. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear business contact information, enhancing its credibility and trustworthiness. Technically, the website employs standard web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. SEO practices are well implemented with comprehensive meta tags and Open Graph data, although accessibility features are basic. The site uses tracking pixels from Meta and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes but lacks a visible cookie consent mechanism, which may impact privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes domain verification meta tags for Google, Facebook, and Microsoft, indicating some level of security awareness. However, no explicit security headers or vulnerability disclosure information are present, and privacy and cookie policies are not found in the provided content. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's claims, showing legitimate registration and no privacy protection, which supports the domain's trustworthiness. Overall, Eventfrog presents a solid business and technical foundation with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms, implementing security headers, and providing vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to enhance user trust and regulatory compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eventfrog.ch

This scan found 13 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
100
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eventfrog.ch, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
852
Employees
0
Customers
852
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
9%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for eventfrog.ch.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eventfrog operates in the event management and ticketing sector within Switzerland, serving as a major platform for event discovery and ticket sales. Its business model revolves around providing a free and easy-to-use service for event organizers and attendees, likely generating revenue through value-added services or partnerships. The company targets a wide audience interested in social events, parties, and cultural activities. The presence of multiple localized domains (.ch, .de, .at) suggests regional expansion and a strategic approach to market penetration in German-speaking countries. The company maintains a professional online presence with verified domain ownership and contact details, supporting its market credibility. However, the absence of visible certifications or detailed business registration information limits deeper insights into corporate structure and scale.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enforced and domain verification meta tags present, which are positive indicators. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found, but the absence of a published privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and vulnerability disclosure reduces compliance with GDPR and best security practices. Incident response contact information is also missing, which could delay handling of security incidents. The use of tracking pixels without explicit user consent mechanisms may pose privacy risks. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, improvements are needed to elevate the security maturity and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eventfrog
Description
With more than 25'000 published events, Eventfrog is Switzerland's largest event calendar. Sell tickets simple and free of charge. Discover events near you.
Key services
Event publishing, Ticket sales, Event discovery
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https)
  • Google and Facebook domain verification meta tags

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Meta (Facebook) Pixel
Marketing tools
GlobalTrackingService
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-branded.
  2. Contact information is clearly provided in meta tags but no visible contact form in provided HTML.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. Tracking and marketing pixels are present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism found.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with compressed CSS and JavaScript files, indicating optimization efforts. Meta tags and Open Graph data are well structured for SEO and social media sharing. The site is mobile optimized and uses responsive design principles. However, no CMS or backend technologies are explicitly detected from the provided content. Performance is moderate, with deferred script loading and asynchronous CSS loading observed. The absence of detailed hosting or platform information limits deeper infrastructure analysis. Overall, the technical implementation supports a good user experience but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eventfrog.ch. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eventfrog.ch.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.