Skip to main content

Security report for evangeliumtagfuertag.org

Evangelizo.org · Other · Germany

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Evangelium Tag für Tag is a small non-profit religious organization providing daily gospel readings, prayers, and saint information primarily to German-speaking Christian audiences. The website serves as a digital platform for delivering religious content via web and mobile apps, supported by donations and subscription services. The domain has been registered since 2002, indicating a stable and long-term presence in its niche. Technically, the website is built on Angular 9 framework, uses Google Fonts, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. It supports mobile optimization and progressive web app features. Hosting is provided by OVH sas, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with basic SEO and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and domain status protections. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is no visible security policy or incident response information. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Privacy compliance is basic with a GDPR cookie banner and a privacy policy located in the legal notice. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences. Strategic improvements in security headers, DNSSEC, and transparency around security policies would enhance its security posture and compliance maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching evangeliumtagfuertag.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Evangelium Tag für Tag operates in the religious content sector, targeting German-speaking Christians interested in daily gospel and saint readings. Its business model is non-profit, relying on donations and subscription-based email delivery. The organization maintains a niche market position with a loyal audience. The presence of mobile apps on major platforms indicates a commitment to accessibility and user engagement. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a focus on digital interaction via forms and app channels. The domain's long registration history and consistent branding support credibility. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced with a valid SSL certificate, and domain status flags prevent unauthorized domain transfer or deletion. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact, limiting transparency and readiness for security incidents. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, which requires careful configuration to avoid privacy issues. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced DNS security, security headers, and published security governance documents.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and cookie usage in the privacy policy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Evangelizo.org
Description
A religious non-profit service providing daily gospel readings, prayers, and saint information primarily in German language.
Key services
Daily gospel readings, Saints of the day information, Prayers, Subscription-based email delivery of texts, Mobile app availability
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 9, Google Fonts (Roboto, Circular Std), Google Tag Manager, Manifest for PWA
Frameworks
Angular
Platforms
Web, Android, iOS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides religious daily gospel content in German.
  2. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page; contact via form only.
  3. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond GDPR cookie banner and legal notice.
  4. Uses modern Angular framework and PWA manifest for mobile support.
  5. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure.
  7. Google Tag Manager used for analytics and tracking.
  8. No advertising networks detected beyond analytics.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-term operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern Angular 9 framework with a progressive web app manifest, supporting mobile platforms including Android and iOS. Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager are integrated for typography and analytics respectively. Hosting is via OVH sas, a reputable provider. The site loads with moderate performance and basic SEO optimization. Accessibility features are present but could be improved. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or framework-based site. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt in security. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but has room for modernization in security and SEO best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with evangeliumtagfuertag.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review evangeliumtagfuertag.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.