Skip to main content

Security report for eurosign.lv

EuroSign SIA · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EuroSign SIA is a Latvian small business specializing in large format digital printing, small batch printing, and personalized advertising solutions. Additionally, it distributes professional communication technology products from the European brand Axtel, including headphones, IP phones, and video conferencing equipment. The company targets business customers seeking advertising and communication technology services within Latvia. The website is built using EverWeb CMS with jQuery and Splide.js for interactive sliders, presenting a professional and content-rich user experience. However, the site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which may affect compliance with GDPR regulations. Security posture is moderate, with HTTPS implied but no visible security headers or advanced protections. Contact information is comprehensive, including multiple company emails, phone numbers, and a physical address in Jelgava, Latvia. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eurosign.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EuroSign SIA operates primarily in the printing and communication technology sectors, serving local Latvian businesses. Its competitive advantage lies in combining printing services with distribution of Axtel communication products, positioning it as a niche provider in both advertising and business communication solutions. The business model is B2B focused, with revenue streams from printing services and product sales. The company has been established since 2008, indicating stability and experience. Partnerships with Axtel and presence on social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram support its market presence. The website content and branding are consistent, reinforcing trustworthiness. Growth opportunities may include expanding digital marketing and enhancing compliance to attract more clients.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The contact form includes client-side validation but no explicit anti-spam or advanced security measures are evident. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit user behavior insights. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, formal privacy policies, and incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Enhance contact form security with CAPTCHA or other anti-spam mechanisms and ensure server-side validation.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy or contact channel for security issues to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Consider adding analytics with privacy-respecting configurations to better understand user behavior and improve marketing efforts.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
EuroSign SIA
Registration number
LV43603035207
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EuroSign SIA
Description
EuroSign SIA offers large format digital printing, small batch printing, personalized advertising solutions, and communication technology products from Axtel. Services include printing on self-adhesive films, paper, banners, and other materials, as well as design and small print jobs. They also distribute Axtel business communication products such as headphones, IP phones, webcams, and video conferencing equipment.
Key services
Large format printing, Small batch printing, Personalized advertising solutions, Distribution of Axtel communication products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
EverWeb CMS, jQuery, Splide.js slider
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://www.eurosign.lv/)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multiple images
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including emails, phone numbers, and physical address
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  5. No security headers detected in HTML content; security posture could be improved
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking
  7. Website uses EverWeb CMS and jQuery with Splide sliders for UI
  8. Business is a small Latvian company specializing in printing and communication technology distribution
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on EverWeb CMS, utilizing jQuery and Splide.js for interactive sliders. The design is professional and content-rich, with good navigation clarity and moderate mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no evident heavy scripts or trackers. SEO is basic but includes meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider information is detected. The site lacks modern security headers and privacy compliance features, representing technical debt and modernization opportunities. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eurosign.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eurosign.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.