Skip to main content

Security report for euroregion-pomoravi.cz

Euroregion-pomoravi · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Euroregion Pomoraví is a non-profit organization focused on supporting municipalities and regional entities through cross-border cooperation primarily with Austria and Slovakia. The organization facilitates EU-supported projects, consulting, partner searches, and various cultural and informational activities. The website reflects a regional government/non-profit entity with a clear mission to foster cooperation and development at the regional level. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including JavaScript modules, Google Tag Manager for analytics, and responsive design with Google Fonts. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring secure communication. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers and published privacy policies are missing, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. From a security perspective, the site shows no signs of blocking or WAF interference and does not expose sensitive data. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy, but the professional presentation and contact transparency mitigate some risk. The site lacks formal security policies and incident response contacts, which are recommended for improved security posture. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and serves its business purpose well, but improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency would strengthen its trustworthiness and compliance with modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euroregion-pomoravi.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Euroregion Pomoraví operates in the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on regional development and cross-border cooperation. Its market position is that of a regional facilitator and partner for EU-funded projects and local municipalities. The business model revolves around providing consulting, project support, and networking services to municipalities and organizations. The organization benefits from partnerships with multiple municipalities and regional entities, as evidenced by the extensive member and partner logos. The target customers are local governments, regional organizations, and stakeholders involved in cross-border cooperation. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized organization with a focused regional scope. Growth indicators include active project funding programs and cultural initiatives. The partnership ecosystem is strong, involving local municipalities and cross-border partners from Austria and Slovakia.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data exposure. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates some level of user tracking but no advanced security or privacy controls are evident. The absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces the security posture. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files are present, and no incident response contacts are published. GDPR compliance is partial, with no visible privacy policy but presence of cookie consent mechanisms. The security culture appears basic, suitable for a non-profit regional organization but with room for improvement to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user and service agreements.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact information.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to enhance transparency and security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Euroregion Pomoraví, spolek
Registration number
65 33 80 81
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Euroregion-pomoravi
Description
Euroregion Pomoraví supports municipalities by creating conditions for cross-border cooperation and helps at the regional level in areas supported by the European Union. It is a partner for cross-border cooperation with Austria and Slovakia.
Key services
Consulting, Partner search, EU project support, Author readings, Publication collections, Round tables, Information on subsidy programs, Small Projects Fund (FMP)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Tiny Slider, Google Fonts (Ubuntu), CSS Modules
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • Secure email links

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern frontend technologies.
  4. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Contact information is clearly provided with emails and phone numbers.
  6. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  7. Content is relevant to regional government and non-profit cooperation.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  10. Branding and design are consistent and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based frontend with modular scripts and CSS modules, indicating a contemporary development approach. Google Fonts and Tiny Slider are used for UI and typography. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and tracking. The site is responsive and mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external resources and image sizes. No CMS or hosting provider is explicitly identified. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported with meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of formal privacy and terms pages, which could affect compliance and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euroregion-pomoravi.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euroregion-pomoravi.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.