Skip to main content

Security report for euroopanoored.eu

Erasmus+ ja Euroopa Solidaarsuskorpuse agentuur · Government · Estonia

Partial score · DNS & email only

52/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents the Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps national agency in Estonia, providing comprehensive information, resources, and support for youth, youth workers, and organizations involved in European youth programs. It serves as a government-funded platform facilitating access to program opportunities, project guidance, and community engagement. The site is well-positioned as the authoritative national agency for these programs, targeting youth and professionals in the youth sector. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern performance and SEO optimizations, including WP Rocket and The SEO Framework. It employs Google Site Kit for analytics and consent management, ensuring GDPR compliance with a robust cookie consent mechanism. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and fast-loading, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and employs consent mode to restrict tracking and personalization. While explicit security headers and incident response policies are not evident, no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The domain registration is consistent with the agency's Estonian identity, registered through a reputable local registrar without privacy protection, appropriate for a government entity. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture, excellent content quality, and good privacy compliance, making it a trustworthy and professional platform for its audience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euroopanoored.eu

This scan found 18 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
52

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The agency operates as a government entity focused on youth development through European programs. Its competitive advantage lies in official backing and comprehensive program coverage. The business model is non-commercial, funded by government and EU resources, focusing on information dissemination, project support, and training. Target customers include youth, youth workers, and organizations in Estonia. Growth indicators include active content updates, social media engagement, and event calendars. The partnership ecosystem includes EU program bodies and local educational institutions. Strategic observations highlight a focus on digital maturity and compliance, with opportunities to enhance security transparency and incident response readiness.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent mechanisms, and minimal tracking. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were found. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. GDPR compliance is well addressed through consent management. The security culture appears proactive but could benefit from formalized vulnerability disclosure and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Maintain and regularly update cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms to align with evolving regulations.
  5. Enhance monitoring and auditing of third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Erasmus+ ja Euroopa Solidaarsuskorpuse agentuur
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Erasmus+ ja Euroopa Solidaarsuskorpuse agentuur
Description
Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps national agency providing information, support, and project opportunities for youth, youth workers, and organizations in Estonia.
Key services
Information dissemination, Project application guidance, Training and events, Resource provision, Experience sharing
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Google Site Kit, WP Rocket, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
The SEO Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with consent mode denying personalization and ad storage
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and consent plugins

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, well-structured, and professionally presented.
  3. Strong compliance with GDPR and cookie consent requirements.
  4. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimization plugins.
  6. Social media presence on major platforms is clearly linked.
  7. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages WordPress CMS with modern plugins for SEO (The SEO Framework), performance (WP Rocket), and analytics (Google Site Kit). The use of minified CSS and JS, preloading images, and lazy loading contributes to fast performance. The site is mobile responsive with good accessibility features such as skip links and semantic HTML. Structured data (JSON-LD) is implemented for SEO and social sharing. Hosting details are limited but domain registrar is a reputable Estonian company. Technical risks are low, with opportunities to improve security headers and incident response capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euroopanoored.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euroopanoored.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.