Skip to main content

Security report for euregio-teschinensis.eu

Euroregion Těšínské Slezsko – Śląsk Cieszyński · Government · Poland

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

35/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Euregio-Teschinensis website serves as an informational platform for the Euroregion Těšínské Slezsko – Śląsk Cieszyński, a cross-border cooperation initiative between Poland and the Czech Republic. It focuses on regional development, cultural events, and cooperation projects, targeting local governments, residents, and tourists. The site is multilingual and provides links to partner organizations and social media channels to enhance regional engagement. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Twenty Seventeen theme and includes plugins for video galleries and cookie consent management. The site employs HTTPS and a cookie consent mechanism that restricts ad and analytics storage by default, reflecting a good privacy posture. However, it lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, and no contact emails or phone numbers are directly provided on the main page. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The WHOIS data indicates a consistent and legitimate domain registration without privacy protection, appropriate for a regional governmental/non-profit entity. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for its niche audience but could improve by adding comprehensive privacy and security policies, explicit contact information, and enhanced security headers to strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching euregio-teschinensis.eu

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
35

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Euregio-Teschinensis operates as a non-profit regional cooperation platform facilitating cross-border collaboration between Polish and Czech communities. Its market position is niche, focusing on cultural promotion, regional development, and microproject funding. The business model centers on information dissemination and fostering cooperation rather than commercial activities. The target audience includes local governments, residents, and tourists interested in the Euroregion. The partnership ecosystem is robust, linking to multiple regional organizations and forums, enhancing its credibility and reach. Growth indicators are modest, aligned with regional cooperation goals rather than commercial expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent mechanism that denies ad and analytics storage by default, supporting GDPR compliance. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No forms or data collection points were detected that could introduce vulnerabilities. The absence of a security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy indicates limited formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but could be enhanced to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen site security.
  3. Provide explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for user support and incident reporting.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from outdated software.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Euroregion Těšínské Slezsko – Śląsk Cieszyński
Description
The website represents the Euroregion Těšínské Slezsko – Śląsk Cieszyński, a cross-border cooperation agreement between Polish and Czech sides. It provides information about regional cooperation, microproject funds, territorial cooperation forums, and cultural events such as video and photo competitions.
Key services
Information on Euroregion cooperation, Microproject Fund details, Territorial Cooperation Forum, Photo and video competitions, Tourism promotion
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.4.2, jQuery 1.12.4, Gallery Videos Plugin, Cookie Script Consent
Frameworks
WordPress Twenty Seventeen Theme
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with denied ad and analytics storage by default
  • Security storage granted in consent

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based regional cooperation platform.
  2. Content is multilingual with Czech, Polish, and English versions.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with strict default denials for ad and analytics storage.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the main page.
  6. Social media presence is active with official Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube channels.
  7. No forms detected on the main page.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable WordPress 5.4.2 platform using the Twenty Seventeen theme, supplemented by plugins for video galleries and cookie consent management. The tech stack includes jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries. Performance is moderate with standard fonts loaded from Google Fonts and CDN usage for cookie scripts. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements present. SEO optimization is basic, with meta tags and hreflang attributes for multilingual support. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Technical risks include outdated WordPress version and lack of advanced security headers, which should be addressed to reduce potential vulnerabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 37/100High38 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with euregio-teschinensis.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review euregio-teschinensis.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.