Skip to main content

Security report for eupol-afg.eu

Other · Germany

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

26/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website eupol-afg.eu is a German language informational blog focused on insurance topics including private accident insurance, legal protection insurance, car insurance, and term life insurance. It is not the official site of eupol-afg.eu but serves as an affiliate content platform providing articles and links to insurance comparison and provider websites. The site targets German-speaking individuals seeking insurance information and comparisons. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 5.3.2 using Bootstrap and Font Awesome, with an outdated jQuery version 1.12.4. The site is served over HTTP without HTTPS, which is a significant security concern. No security headers or cookie consent mechanisms are present, and no verifiable contact or business information is provided on the site. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policies for .eu domains, limiting trust assessment. Overall, the site has basic content quality and technical implementation but falls short on security and privacy compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
3/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eupol-afg.eu

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
3
Average
26

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eupol-afg.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for eupol-afg.eu right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site operates as a small-scale informational blog with an affiliate marketing business model, linking to insurance comparison portals and providers. It lacks clear business identity or official branding and does not provide direct contact information. The content is relevant and targeted at German consumers interested in insurance products. The site’s market position is niche and informational, with no evidence of direct insurance services or official organizational backing. The affiliate ecosystem includes multiple insurance comparison domains. Growth indicators or parent/subsidiary relationships are not evident.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and use of outdated JavaScript libraries with known vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided. Privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent or GDPR indicators. The site does not expose sensitive data but lacks modern security best practices. The absence of contact information and security disclosures further reduces trustworthiness. Immediate improvements are needed to secure the site and comply with privacy regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all site traffic.
  2. Upgrade jQuery and other JavaScript libraries to current supported versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent banner and privacy compliance mechanisms to align with GDPR requirements.
  5. Provide verifiable contact information and business identity details to improve trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website provides informational blog content primarily about insurance topics such as private accident insurance, legal protection insurance, car insurance, and term life insurance. It is not an official site of eupol-afg.eu but rather an informational blog in German.
Key services
Insurance information articles, Insurance provider comparisons via affiliate links
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.12.4, Bootstrap 3.x, Font Awesome, WordPress 5.3.2
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries explicitly detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a German language informational blog about insurance topics.
  2. No official company or organizational branding found; disclaimer states it is not the official eupol-afg.eu site.
  3. No HTTPS detected; site served over HTTP only.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found on site.
  5. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected; privacy policy page exists but is basic.
  6. Uses outdated jQuery version which may pose security risks.
  7. No security headers detected in HTML source.
  8. Affiliate links to insurance comparison sites are prominent.
  9. No social media links or official contact information present.
  10. WHOIS data is unavailable due to EURid privacy policy for .eu domains.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 5.3.2 with Bootstrap and Font Awesome for styling and layout. jQuery version 1.12.4 is used, which is outdated and may have security vulnerabilities. The site is served over HTTP only, lacking HTTPS encryption. The HTML structure is basic with minimal SEO optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved with modern technologies and optimization. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected. The site relies on affiliate links for monetization. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eupol-afg.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eupol-afg.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.