Skip to main content

Security report for eucerin.com

Other · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website at select.eucerin.com appears to be related to the Eucerin skincare brand, likely serving as a country selector or product information portal. However, the domain WHOIS data is missing or the domain is unregistered, which raises significant concerns about the legitimacy and ownership of the site. The website content is incomplete and truncated, with no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, and no contact information or security policies are provided. Technically, the site uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking but lacks visible security headers or SSL configuration details. Overall, the site shows low digital maturity and poor security posture, with minimal compliance to privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eucerin.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business behind the site is presumably Beiersdorf, the owner of the Eucerin brand, a well-known player in the skincare industry. The site targets consumers looking for skincare products and information. However, the lack of WHOIS registration data and absence of business contact details on this subdomain reduce the credibility of this particular site instance. The business model is likely product marketing and e-commerce support. The site appears to be a small or medium-sized digital presence, possibly a regional or country-specific portal. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries linked directly from this domain.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak due to the absence of WHOIS registration data, lack of security headers, and no visible SSL/TLS configuration details. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. The site uses tracking technologies but does not provide user consent mechanisms. There is no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available. These gaps expose the site to potential trust and legal risks.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Configure HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS certificates and implement security headers such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to identify and remediate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. WHOIS query returned 'No match for "SELECT.EUCERIN.COM"' indicating domain is not registered or WHOIS data is unavailable. The HTML content is truncated and incomplete, indicating possible access restrictions or minimal content. No WAF challenge detected explicitly. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Beiersdorf Tracking Scripts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Beiersdorf tracking scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. WHOIS data unavailable or domain unregistered
  2. Website content incomplete and truncated
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected
  4. No contact information or security policies found
  5. Uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking
  6. No explicit security headers or SSL configuration details available
  7. Content is related to skincare products, safe for general audience
  8. No WAF or security challenge detected explicitly
  9. Overall low trust and credibility due to missing WHOIS and policy information
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking user interactions. The HTML content is heavily truncated and lacks structured data such as JSON-LD or Open Graph metadata. No CMS or hosting provider information is discernible. The site shows moderate mobile optimization and basic accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO optimizations. The absence of security headers and SSL details indicates technical debt and potential risks. Performance appears moderate but cannot be fully assessed due to incomplete content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eucerin.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eucerin.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.