Skip to main content

Security report for eu-inc.org

EU–INC · Government · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EU–INC is a pan-European initiative proposing a standardized legal entity to facilitate startup scaling across Europe. The website serves as an advocacy platform, providing information about the proposal, political engagement, and ways to support the initiative. It targets European startups, founders, investors, and policymakers, aiming to reduce fragmentation and regulatory burdens across EU member states. The site references collaboration with European Commission officials and includes media coverage links, enhancing its credibility. Technically, the website is built using Framer, a modern web design platform, employing JavaScript and web fonts for a professional and responsive user experience. The site loads moderately fast and is optimized for mobile devices. However, it lacks explicit security headers and privacy policies, which are important for compliance and trust. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, contact information for security incidents, and WHOIS transparency are notable gaps. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed query response, limiting domain trust assessment. Overall, the website is professional and informative but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance, security best practices, and transparent contact information to improve trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eu-inc.org

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EU–INC positions itself as a pioneering pan-European legal entity proposal, aiming to unify startup legal frameworks across EU countries. Its competitive advantage lies in addressing regulatory fragmentation, a known barrier for European startups scaling internationally. The business model is advocacy and community-driven, relying on political engagement and public support. Revenue streams are not evident, suggesting a non-commercial or nonprofit orientation. Target customers include founders, investors, and policymakers within the EU startup ecosystem. Growth indicators include active collaboration with EU Commissioners and interest from the European Parliament and Council. The partnership ecosystem includes legal teams, funds, and startup founders. Strategic observations highlight the initiative's potential to reshape European startup legal infrastructure, though success depends on political will and member state support.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, limiting incident response readiness. Privacy compliance gaps are evident due to missing privacy and cookie policies and absence of GDPR compliance indicators. The lack of contact information for security incidents reduces transparency and trust. Overall, while the site is not exposed to immediate risks, implementing security best practices and compliance measures would strengthen its security posture and stakeholder confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance WHOIS transparency by ensuring domain registration details are publicly available and consistent with website claims.
  5. Regularly audit and update the website's technical stack and security configurations to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EU–INC
Description
EU–INC is a proposal for a pan-European standardized legal entity to unlock pan-European startup scaling.
Key services
Proposal of a pan-European legal entity, Central EU-level registry, Standardized investment documents, Standardized EU-wide stock options, Local taxes and employment facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer (website builder), JavaScript, Web fonts (Inter, Apfel Grotezk, MonoSpecVariable)
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL and external links)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
events.framer.com
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a proposal platform for a pan-European legal entity called EU–INC.
  2. Content is well-structured and professionally presented.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  5. No forms or data collection fields present on the main page.
  6. Social media presence on Twitter (X) and LinkedIn confirmed.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment.
  9. No advertising or tracking networks detected beyond Framer's event tracking.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging modern JavaScript modules and web fonts for a visually appealing and responsive design. The use of modulepreload hints at performance optimization efforts. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility and SEO practices, including proper meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and no advanced backend technologies or CMS beyond Framer are detected. Performance is moderate, with no critical errors or broken elements observed. Opportunities exist to improve technical robustness by adding security headers and enhancing privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eu-inc.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eu-inc.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.