Skip to main content

Security report for etnopramogos.lt

Etnopramogos · Other · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Etnopramogos is a small Lithuanian business focused on providing ethnographic or cultural entertainment services. The website is built on WordPress and uses common plugins such as Smart Slider 3, Visual Composer, and Contact Form 7. The technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website, hosted by HOSTINGER operations, UAB. The website is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking content. However, the site lacks important compliance elements such as privacy and cookie policies, which impacts GDPR compliance. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but missing critical security headers and incident response information. Overall, the website is functional but basic in design and content quality, with room for improvement in security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching etnopramogos.lt

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the cultural entertainment sector targeting a general audience interested in ethnographic experiences. The business model is service-oriented with a local market focus. The website content and structure suggest a small-scale operation founded in 2017. There are no visible partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of detailed business information and trust indicators limits the perceived credibility. The company could benefit from enhanced digital presence and clearer business information to improve market positioning.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS but lacks security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS, which are important for mitigating common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact, which reduces preparedness for security incidents. No vulnerable libraries were detected, but the absence of security best practices and compliance documentation indicates a low to moderate security maturity level. The site does not appear to collect extensive user data or use analytics, reducing exposure but also limiting insights into user behavior.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to enhance security posture.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy with clear contact channels for security issues.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website content quality and navigation to improve user experience and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Etnopramogos
Description
Etnopramogos appears to be a Lithuanian company offering ethnographic or cultural entertainment services, as suggested by the domain and content structure. The website includes sections for news, services, gallery, and contacts.
Key services
ethnographic entertainment services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Bootstrap, Smart Slider 3, Master Slider 3.5.3, Visual Composer, Contact Form 7, Photonic plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Visual Composer
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on WordPress with common plugins.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided but limited to email and phone.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  6. Website content is minimal and basic but functional.
  7. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  8. No suspicious external domains linked.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a standard set of plugins for sliders, forms, and page building. The hosting provider is HOSTINGER operations, UAB, a reputable hosting company. The site uses jQuery 3.4.1 and Bootstrap for frontend components. Performance is moderate with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO optimization is minimal with no meta description content and limited structured data. Accessibility features are basic with no ARIA landmarks or advanced accessibility tags detected. Overall, the technical implementation is standard for a small business but could benefit from modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with etnopramogos.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review etnopramogos.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.