Skip to main content

Security report for eticsconfigurator.com

Other · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website eticsconfigurator.com currently serves a 404 error page with minimal content, indicating either a misconfiguration or an unavailable resource. The site uses Angular 13.3.11 as its frontend framework and is hosted on infrastructure associated with Akamai, a reputable content delivery network. However, the lack of substantive content, metadata, and contact information limits the ability to fully assess the business or technical maturity. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers and no visible HTTPS enforcement data. Privacy and compliance policies are missing, which is a significant gap for user trust and regulatory adherence. Overall, the site appears to be in an early or incomplete state, requiring substantial improvements in content, security, and compliance to be considered professional and trustworthy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eticsconfigurator.com

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
75
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

No explicit business information or descriptions are present on the analyzed page. The domain was registered in 2018 with a reputable registrar and uses Akamai nameservers, suggesting a legitimate business intent. However, the lack of visible company details, contact information, or service descriptions prevents detailed business intelligence analysis. The site likely targets a niche or internal audience given the technical nature of the URL and minimal public content. No partnerships or related domains were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The security posture is currently weak due to the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others. No HTTPS configuration details were provided, but the domain uses Akamai nameservers which typically support HTTPS. No forms or input fields are present, reducing immediate attack surface, but the lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The site should implement standard security best practices and compliance documentation to improve trust and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a proper 404 error page with helpful navigation and user guidance.
  2. Add HTTPS enforcement and verify SSL/TLS configuration.
  3. Deploy security headers to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  4. Publish privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Add clear contact information and business details to improve credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Angular 13.3.11, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. The URL leads to a 404 error page with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or forms present on the page.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS details provided in the data.
  5. Angular framework version 13.3.11 is used.
  6. No external links or social media links found in the HTML content.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata present.
  9. Website content is minimal and likely under development or misconfigured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses Angular 13.3.11, indicating a modern JavaScript framework. The presence of multiple CSS stylesheets and JavaScript modules suggests a modular frontend architecture. Hosting via Akamai nameservers indicates use of a CDN for performance and availability. However, the page content is minimal and lacks SEO metadata, structured data, or accessibility features. Performance is likely moderate given CDN usage but cannot be fully assessed due to limited content. The site would benefit from improved metadata, accessibility enhancements, and comprehensive content to reduce technical debt and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eticsconfigurator.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eticsconfigurator.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.