Skip to main content

Security report for eteam.dk

Eteam - Hjemmeside og Webshops - Vi er specialister i WordPress · Technology · Denmark

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eteam is a professional Danish web agency specializing in mobile-optimized websites and webshop solutions primarily built on WordPress. The company positions itself as a specialist in WordPress development, offering custom and flexible web solutions with a focus on user-friendly and visually appealing designs. Their target audience includes businesses and individuals seeking professional web presence with mobile responsiveness. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.1, enhanced with Slider Revolution and NitroPack for performance optimization and lazy loading, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is basic, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages detected. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits trust assessment from a registration perspective. Overall, the website is professional, performant, and trustworthy, but would benefit from enhanced privacy disclosures and WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eteam.dk

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eteam operates as a small-sized technology service provider focused on WordPress web development and mobile optimization. Their business model revolves around custom web design and development services, targeting clients who require professional and tailored online solutions. The company emphasizes quality, flexibility, and customer service as competitive advantages. The website content and structured data reinforce their market positioning as specialists in WordPress and mobile-friendly web solutions. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The lack of WHOIS data and privacy policy may impact credibility with privacy-conscious clients. The company appears to maintain a direct client engagement model with contact details prominently displayed and a contact form for inquiries.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security baseline with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data leaks. Use of modern WordPress and NitroPack technologies suggests ongoing maintenance and performance focus. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options are not detected, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response policies are published, indicating room for improvement in transparency and readiness. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but absence of a detailed privacy policy and data protection officer contact reduces compliance maturity. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with formal policies and enhanced headers.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate web-based attacks.
  3. Obtain and publish WHOIS domain registration details or ensure domain registration transparency to enhance legitimacy.
  4. Implement and disclose an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security maturity.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet compliance standards and broaden user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eteam - Hjemmeside og Webshops - Vi er specialister i WordPress
Description
Eteam er et professionelt webbureau med speciale i udvikling af mobiloptimerede hjemmeside og Webshop løsninger
Key services
Mobiloptimeret hjemmeside, Webshop løsninger, WordPress development, Custom web design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Slider Revolution 6.6.3, NitroPack, jQuery, Google Fonts, LazySizes (lazy loading), Nitro CDN
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure contact forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional WordPress-based web agency site with mobile optimization
  3. Clear contact info including phone and email present in header
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust assessment
  7. Use of modern web technologies and performance optimizations
  8. No visible security or privacy policy disclosures
  9. No social media links detected in provided HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS version 6.8.1, utilizing popular plugins like Slider Revolution for rich media sliders and NitroPack for performance optimization including lazy loading and CDN usage. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts with unicode-range subsets for efficiency. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and fast loading times. JavaScript libraries include jQuery and lazySizes for lazy loading images. The site uses AJAX for form submissions and has SEO-friendly meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for enhanced search engine visibility. No major technical debt or outdated technologies are detected. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust, performant, and aligned with modern web standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eteam.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eteam.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.