Skip to main content

Security report for etalinq.com

Other · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 3 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website etalinq.com presents an extremely minimal online presence, consisting solely of a phone number displayed in the body with no additional content, metadata, or branding. The domain is registered since 2013 with OVH sas as the registrar and hosting provider, indicating a stable but small-scale operation likely based in Lithuania. The lack of any privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, combined with no visible security headers or HTTPS confirmation, suggests a low level of digital maturity and security posture. The site does not provide any contact emails, forms, or social media links, limiting user engagement and trust. Technically, the website lacks modern web technologies, frameworks, or CMS platforms, and shows no signs of SEO or accessibility optimization. The hosting provider is OVH sas, a reputable provider, but the site itself does not leverage any advanced infrastructure or security features. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but are likely poor given the minimal content. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and privacy policies are significant concerns. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, which is positive, but the website's lack of transparency and minimal content reduce trustworthiness. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, indicating low preparedness for security incidents. Overall, the website scores low on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility. Strategic recommendations include enabling HTTPS, adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, improving website content and structure, and implementing security best practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching etalinq.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Etalinq.com appears to be a small-scale business or service entity with a minimal digital footprint. The domain age suggests it has been operational since 2013, but the lack of detailed business information, branding, or service descriptions limits insight into its market positioning or business model. The sole contact phone number indicates a direct communication approach, possibly targeting local customers in Lithuania. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or certifications. The business likely operates in a niche or local market segment but lacks online marketing or engagement strategies. Growth indicators and competitive advantages cannot be assessed due to insufficient data.

Security posture

The security posture of etalinq.com is weak. The website does not demonstrate use of HTTPS or security headers, lacks privacy and cookie policies, and provides no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. These gaps expose the site to potential data interception risks and reduce user trust. The domain registration is stable and not privacy protected, which is positive, but the absence of security best practices and transparency indicates low security maturity. There is no evidence of compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. The site would benefit from immediate implementation of HTTPS, security headers, and clear privacy documentation to improve its security stance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance transparency.
  3. Introduce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company email addresses and incident response contacts.
  5. Enhance website content with business descriptions, branding, and navigation to improve user trust and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is extremely minimal, consisting only of a phone number.
  2. No metadata, no forms, no scripts, no external links, no social media links detected.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS information provided; assumed basic SSL configuration from WHOIS hosting provider.
  5. No business identifying information or branding visible on the site.
  6. Domain is registered with OVH since 2013 and is active with no privacy protection.
  7. Overall website quality and security posture is poor due to minimal content and lack of security best practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is extremely minimal with no detectable technologies, frameworks, or CMS platforms. It is hosted by OVH sas, a reputable provider, but the site itself lacks modern web development practices, metadata, or SEO optimization. The absence of scripts, forms, or external links indicates a static and basic HTML page. Performance and mobile optimization are likely poor due to lack of content and structure. There is significant technical debt and modernization opportunity by adopting current web standards, responsive design, and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with etalinq.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review etalinq.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.