Skip to main content

Security report for estheticon.com

Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Estheticon is a healthcare-focused service platform that helps users find plastic surgeons, dermatologists, and aesthetic procedures across multiple countries via regional partner sites. The website is minimalistic, serving primarily as a language selection landing page linking to localized domains. The technical infrastructure is basic, utilizing standard HTML5, CSS3, and Google Fonts, with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS confirmation, missing security headers, and absence of privacy or cookie policies. The WHOIS data is unavailable or missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site appears functional but lacks comprehensive security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of estheticon.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching estheticon.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Estheticon operates in the healthcare sector, specifically targeting aesthetic medical services. Its business model is a service platform connecting users with medical professionals in various countries through localized partner domains. The company targets a general audience seeking aesthetic procedures. The lack of detailed business information, contact data, and certifications limits assessment of market position and growth. The partnership ecosystem is broad, with multiple regional domains linked from the main page, indicating a decentralized but connected network. Revenue streams likely derive from referrals or advertising on partner sites. The minimal content and absence of advanced marketing or analytics tools suggest a modest digital maturity level.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a low security maturity level. No HTTPS status or security headers were detected in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating poor compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The absence of contact information and incident response details further weakens security readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the limited content, but the missing WHOIS data and domain registration information introduce trust concerns. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires significant improvements to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance transparency.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
We help you find your ideal plastic surgeon, dermatologist or aesthetic procedure.
Key services
plastic surgeon search, dermatologist search, aesthetic procedure information
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, Google Fonts (Roboto)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and primarily a landing page with language selection and links to regional domains.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. No contact information or forms present on the analyzed page.
  4. No scripts or analytics detected in the provided HTML.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy.
  6. Website uses Google Fonts and basic CSS styling.
  7. No security headers or HTTPS status provided; SSL status unknown.
  8. No social media or external contact links found in the HTML.
  9. Website targets users seeking aesthetic medical professionals in multiple countries.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a simple technical stack with HTML5, CSS3, and Google Fonts. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is minimalistic with no detected scripts or analytics tools, which reduces complexity but also limits functionality and tracking capabilities. Performance is likely moderate given the simplicity, but mobile optimization and accessibility are basic and could be improved. The lack of security headers and HTTPS confirmation represents a technical risk. The WHOIS data absence suggests potential domain registration or privacy issues that should be investigated.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with estheticon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review estheticon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.