Skip to main content

Security report for estheticon.com

Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Estheticon operates as an online platform facilitating the search for plastic surgeons, dermatologists, and aesthetic procedures across multiple countries via localized domains. The website serves as a multilingual landing page directing users to country-specific sites, indicating a broad international presence in the healthcare aesthetic sector. The business model focuses on providing informational and referral services to individuals seeking aesthetic medical treatments. Technically, the site uses basic modern web standards including Google Fonts and responsive design elements, but lacks advanced frameworks or CMS indications. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS confirmation, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies, which raises compliance concerns especially for GDPR in European markets. The WHOIS data is notably missing or inaccessible, which undermines domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the site is functional but minimalistic, with significant room for improvement in security, compliance, and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching estheticon.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Estheticon's market positioning leverages multiple country-specific domains to target diverse European and Latin American markets in the healthcare aesthetic niche. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its multilingual approach and broad geographic coverage. Revenue streams likely include advertising, lead generation, or partnerships with medical professionals. The target customer segment is individuals seeking aesthetic medical services. Growth indicators are not directly visible from the homepage content. The partnership ecosystem includes sister sites in various countries, enhancing regional reach. Strategic observations suggest the need for enhanced transparency, improved security compliance, and richer content to strengthen market trust and user engagement.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low, with no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, no privacy or cookie policies, and no contact information for incident response. The absence of WHOIS data further complicates trust verification. Compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations are apparent due to missing policies and consent mechanisms. Data protection practices and incident response readiness cannot be assessed due to lack of information. The security culture appears minimal, reflecting a need for strategic improvements to protect user data and enhance trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate site-wide.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies aligned with GDPR requirements.
  3. Add clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
We help you find your ideal plastic surgeon, dermatologist or aesthetic procedure.
Key services
Plastic surgeon search, Dermatologist search, Aesthetic procedure information
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Fonts (Roboto), HTML5, CSS3
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain is unregistered, which is unusual for an active website.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links present in the provided HTML.
  5. Website content is minimal and primarily serves as a language selection landing page linking to country-specific domains.
  6. No forms or data collection mechanisms detected.
  7. No scripts or analytics tools detected beyond Google Fonts.
  8. No security headers or HTTPS status information available from provided data.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Branding is moderate with a single logo image and consistent language flags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML5 and CSS3, utilizing Google Fonts for typography. There is no indication of a CMS or advanced JavaScript frameworks. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features but lacks advanced SEO optimizations and performance enhancements. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the provided data. Technical debt appears low due to simplicity but modernization opportunities exist to improve security, SEO, and user experience. The lack of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection but also limits business intelligence capabilities.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 61/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with estheticon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review estheticon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.