Skip to main content

Security report for espresso.church

ExpiredDomains.com · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ExpiredDomains.com operates as a specialized online platform providing comprehensive listings and insights for expired and expiring domain names. It serves domain investors, SEOs, and marketers by aggregating domain data across numerous TLDs and linking users to trusted registrars like GoDaddy for domain acquisition. The platform is well-positioned in the domain marketplace sector, trusted by thousands of users, and offers a user-friendly interface with detailed domain profiles and filtering capabilities. Technically, the website employs modern web standards with responsive design and moderate performance, supported by Cloudflare DNS and secure HTTPS connections. Security posture is solid with domain status protections and no evident vulnerabilities, though DNSSEC is not enabled and additional security headers could enhance protection. Privacy and cookie policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, with consent mechanisms in place. However, direct contact information such as emails or phone numbers is absent, relying solely on contact forms. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and safe for general audiences, with no adult or explicit content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching espresso.church

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
85
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business model centers on domain marketplace aggregation, leveraging affiliate partnerships with registrars like GoDaddy to monetize expired domain sales. The platform targets domain investors and SEO professionals seeking valuable domain assets. Its competitive advantage lies in exclusive data metrics, daily updated listings, and a user-friendly interface that simplifies domain discovery. The presence of user testimonials and social media engagement supports a strong trust ecosystem. While the company size appears medium, no parent or subsidiary relationships are evident. The platform's growth potential is supported by continuous data updates and integration with major registrars. Strategic partnerships with GoDaddy enhance market reach and credibility.

Security posture

ExpiredDomains.com demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, domain status protections (clientDeleteProhibited, clientRenewProhibited, etc.), and use of Cloudflare DNS services. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of DNSSEC and additional HTTP security headers (e.g., Content-Security-Policy) represents areas for improvement. The site lacks published security policies or incident response contacts, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. Privacy compliance is strong, with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the security risk is low but could be further mitigated by adopting advanced DNS security and publishing formal security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and provide incident response contact information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Consider adding verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve user confidence and support accessibility.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics to ensure no vulnerable or privacy-invasive components are included.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ExpiredDomains.com
Description
ExpiredDomains.com is a free online platform that helps users find valuable expired and expiring domain names. It aggregates domain data from hundreds of top-level domains (TLDs) and displays them in a searchable, filterable format. It connects users to trusted external registrars and marketplaces like GoDaddy for domain purchases.
Key services
Expired domain listings, Domain data insights, Domain auction links, Filtering and search tools
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, SVG icons, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS
  • ClientDeleteProhibited and other domain status flags set

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no WAF blocking.
  2. Content is focused on expired domain sales with detailed domain profile data.
  3. Strong integration with GoDaddy for domain purchases.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  6. Good privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Modern, responsive design with good SEO practices.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, utilizing SVG icons for scalable graphics. It employs Cloudflare for DNS management and GoDaddy as the domain registrar. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some lazy loading for videos and images to improve load times. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Accessibility is basic but functional. The technical infrastructure supports the business model effectively, though opportunities exist to enhance security and performance through modern best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with espresso.church. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review espresso.church.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.