Skip to main content

Security report for espcommunity.eu

EUSAIR Stakeholders Platform · Government · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The EUSAIR Stakeholders Platform website serves as a governmental/non-profit platform to support the EU Strategy for the Adriatic-Ionian Region by facilitating stakeholder engagement, coordination, and implementation. It offers services such as virtual working groups, event organization support, and educational content. The platform targets regional stakeholders including managing authorities and youth participants. Technically, the website is built on Joomla CMS with Gridbox and Smart Slider 3, hosted by PDR Ltd., and uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap and jQuery. The site is HTTPS enabled and integrates Google Analytics for tracking. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and visible contact information, which are areas for improvement. The security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the provided content. Overall, the website is professional and relevant to its audience but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching espcommunity.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
50
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
28
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention espcommunity.eu, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
1
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for espcommunity.eu.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform occupies a niche role in supporting the EUSAIR EU Strategy, providing coordination tools and information sharing for stakeholders in the Adriatic-Ionian region. Its business model is non-profit/governmental, focusing on regional cooperation rather than commercial revenue. The site demonstrates active event promotion and educational initiatives, indicating engagement with its target audience. The presence of social media channels supports outreach and community building. The platform's market position is as a key enabler for EUSAIR implementation, with potential growth through expanded services and stakeholder involvement.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in scripts, indicating basic security awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection reduces its defense-in-depth. No forms or input fields were detected in the provided content, limiting exposure to input-based vulnerabilities. The lack of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information suggests limited transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact channels to improve security transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search engine visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EUSAIR Stakeholders Platform
Description
The EUSAIR Stakeholders Platform is a tool to increase stakeholder engagement, coordination, and implementation processes for the EU Strategy for the Adriatic-Ionian Region. It supports creation of virtual working groups, event organization, learning content, and embedding processes related to EUSAIR.
Key services
Virtual working groups, Event organization support, Learning content and courses, Embedding process facilitation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla CMS, Gridbox Website Builder, Smart Slider 3, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
Joomla
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • CSRF token present in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Joomla CMS with Gridbox builder and Smart Slider 3 for UI.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter is active.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content.
  5. HTTPS is enabled with Google Analytics tracking implemented.
  6. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
  7. Content is focused on EU regional cooperation and stakeholder engagement.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS with the Gridbox website builder and uses Smart Slider 3 for interactive content. It leverages Bootstrap and jQuery libraries, and Google Fonts for typography. Hosting is provided by PDR Ltd., a known registrar and hosting provider. The site loads Google Analytics scripts asynchronously for performance. The design is responsive and mobile-optimized with moderate performance. However, no advanced SEO or accessibility features were detected. The site lacks security headers and explicit privacy compliance mechanisms. Technical debt appears low but could be reduced further by updating libraries and improving security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with espcommunity.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review espcommunity.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.