Skip to main content

Security report for espaceshop.cz

E-commerce · Czech Republic

Partial score · DNS & email only

57/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.espaceshop.cz is an e-commerce platform currently unavailable due to maintenance. The site uses ineShop version 8.9.5.27 as its CMS. The content is minimal, consisting only of a maintenance notice in Czech and English, with no interactive elements or business information visible. The WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or lack of public registration data. This limits the ability to verify ownership or legitimacy. Technically, the site lacks visible security headers, HTTPS information, or privacy policies, which are critical for e-commerce trust and compliance. Overall, the site shows low digital maturity and poor content quality.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching espaceshop.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
57

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business appears to be a small e-commerce retailer based in the Czech Republic, targeting general consumers. The platform is built on ineShop, a Czech e-commerce CMS. There is no visible information about company size, founding year, or market position. The lack of contact details and policies suggests limited transparency and possibly a small or early-stage operation. No partnerships or certifications are evident. The business model is straightforward online retail, but the current maintenance status and minimal content hinder customer engagement and trust.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS/SSL information, no security headers detected, and no privacy or cookie policies. The lack of WHOIS registrant data further reduces trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The site does not appear to implement modern security best practices, which is concerning for an e-commerce platform handling customer data. There is no evidence of exposed vulnerabilities, but the minimal content limits assessment. Overall, the security score is low, and improvements are critical.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user data and improve trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Add clear contact information including company address, phone, and email for transparency.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish an incident response plan and publish vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is an online shop platform currently under maintenance and temporarily unavailable.
Key services
online retail via e-commerce platform
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
ineShop 8.9.5.27
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently down for maintenance with a simple static message.
  2. No contact information, privacy, cookie, or terms policies found.
  3. No forms or interactive elements present.
  4. No security headers or HTTPS information available.
  5. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues.
  6. Minimal external links only to the developer site (www.ine.cz).
  7. No analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts detected.
  8. Content is minimal and not sufficient for full business or security analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on ineShop 8.9.5.27, a Czech e-commerce CMS. The HTML is minimal and lacks modern meta tags, structured data, or SEO optimization. No external scripts or analytics services are detected. The site is currently down for maintenance, which limits performance and user experience assessment. No mobile optimization or accessibility features are evident. The lack of HTTPS and security headers indicates technical debt and potential risks. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not available. Overall, the technical implementation is basic and requires modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with espaceshop.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review espaceshop.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.