Skip to main content

Security report for esmedia.cz

ESMEDIA Interactive s.r.o. · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ESMEDIA Interactive s.r.o. is a Czech-based company specializing in e-commerce solutions, online marketing, PPC, SEO, and content development. With over 25 years of experience and a client base exceeding 170 entities across business, healthcare, and government sectors, the company positions itself as a comprehensive service provider from concept through development to marketing and operation. Their website showcases a broad portfolio of projects and clients, emphasizing custom solutions and digital marketing expertise. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Bootstrap, jQuery, Leaflet.js for maps, and Google reCAPTCHA for form security. The site is mobile-optimized with good SEO practices and moderate performance. However, some security best practices such as explicit security headers are missing. The site uses HTTPS with a presumably good SSL configuration. Security posture is solid with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data, but the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service reduces compliance maturity. Cookie consent is implemented properly. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but the website content and business information appear professional and credible. Overall, the site is well-constructed and business-focused, with room for improvement in privacy and security policy transparency. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and security policies, adding security headers, and improving accessibility compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of esmedia.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching esmedia.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
50
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ESMEDIA operates in the competitive e-commerce and digital marketing sector, targeting businesses requiring tailored online solutions. Their extensive client list and project portfolio indicate a strong market position in the Czech Republic, serving diverse sectors including healthcare and government. The business model centers on end-to-end digital services, combining development, marketing, and operational support. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing service agreements. The company demonstrates growth through diversified services and client retention. Partnerships and certifications are hinted at but not explicitly detailed. The company maintains a professional brand image and consistent messaging, supporting credibility and client trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanism is evident. GDPR compliance is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, security practices are adequate for the business type but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and improving header configurations.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact information for security issues.
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance website accessibility to meet recognized standards and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ESMEDIA Interactive s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ24251828
Registration number
24251828
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ESMEDIA Interactive s.r.o.
Description
Baví nás vývoj smysluplných e-commerce řešení a zajišťujeme jejich provoz a rozvoj pro reálné výsledky.
Key services
Web and web applications development, Online marketing (PPC, SEO, content development), Custom e-shops, Mobile applications
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, jQuery, Bootstrap, Leaflet.js, Google reCAPTCHA, Nette Forms
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
PPC campaigns (mentioned in content)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and references
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or registry restrictions
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  5. Contact information is clear and complete
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  7. No security headers detected in HTML source
  8. No visible forms collecting personal data except contact form with reCAPTCHA
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Leaflet.js for interactive maps, and Google services for analytics and tag management. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and integrates Google reCAPTCHA for form security. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site is mobile-optimized and has clear navigation. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 50/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with esmedia.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review esmedia.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.