Skip to main content

Security report for esharkdesign.com

123B · Other · Vietnam

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 3 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

123B is an online gambling platform primarily targeting the Vietnamese market, offering a variety of betting services including live casino, sports betting, lottery, and other gambling games. The business claims to have been founded in 2012 with headquarters in the Philippines and positions itself as a reputable and leading betting house in Asia. The website is built on WordPress with a modern theme and plugins, providing a good user experience and SEO optimization. Contact information and social media presence support business credibility. However, the domain WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises concerns about registration transparency and trustworthiness. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking important security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from improved security and compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching esharkdesign.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
45
Email security
65
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the online gambling sector, targeting adult Vietnamese users interested in casino and sports betting. Its business model relies on affiliate marketing and direct user registrations, with incentives such as 100K VND bonuses for new members. The presence of multiple social media channels and a DMCA badge indicates efforts to build trust and brand recognition. The partnership with the domain 668.vincom.vip suggests an affiliate or payment processing relationship. The lack of WHOIS transparency and domain mismatch may indicate use of proxy or subdomain hosting, which could affect user trust. The company appears medium-sized with a focus on digital marketing and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data in the HTML source. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are important to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible cookie consent mechanism, which is a compliance gap for GDPR and similar regulations. No incident response or security policy information is published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of common WordPress plugins and themes requires regular security audits to avoid vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and privacy compliance mechanisms to align with GDPR and other privacy laws.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and provide incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly update and audit WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider clarifying domain registration details and aligning domain branding with the business name to enhance legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
123B
Description
123B là nhà cái cá cược online có trụ sở chính tại Philippines. 123B được ra mắt lần đầu tiên năm 2012 tại thị trường HongKong. Cung cấp sản phẩm cá cược như: Thể thao, Casino Online, Xổ số, Lô đề, Nổ hũ, Bắn cá.
Key services
Live casino, Sports betting, Lottery, Lô đề, Cockfighting, Jackpot games
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Flatsome theme 3.14.3, KK Star Ratings plugin, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
b-traffic.pages.dev
Marketing tools
Rank Math PRO SEO plugin
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a gambling platform branded as 123B targeting Vietnamese market
  2. Content is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected
  3. WHOIS data for domain is missing or unavailable, indicating possible privacy protection or unregistered domain
  4. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and themes
  5. Contact information and social media links are provided and consistent
  6. No explicit adult content but gambling content requires age restrictions
  7. Security headers are missing, and cookie consent is absent
  8. Advertising and affiliate links are present
  9. SEO and structured data are well implemented
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS version 6.8.1 with the Flatsome theme and KK Star Ratings plugin. It loads jQuery 3.7.1 and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses affiliate links and external domains for app downloads and marketing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a WordPress-based gambling site but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with esharkdesign.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review esharkdesign.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.