Skip to main content

Security report for escortsaffair.com

EscortsAffair.com · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EscortsAffair.com operates as an online escort directory platform offering listings of female escorts with incall and outcall services across multiple countries and cities. The website provides a comprehensive directory with photos and videos, targeting individuals seeking companionship. The business model is based on classified ads and adult SEO services, positioning itself as a leading escort directory with a broad geographic footprint. Technically, the website uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Font Awesome, with Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile responsive and has a moderate performance profile. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information. SEO optimization is good with proper meta tags and structured navigation. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options. There is no cookie consent mechanism or explicit privacy compliance features beyond a basic privacy policy. WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency and trustworthiness. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the website is functional and professionally designed but has moderate trust and security posture due to missing WHOIS data and limited privacy compliance. Strategic improvements in security headers, privacy mechanisms, and domain registration transparency are recommended to enhance credibility and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching escortsaffair.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EscortsAffair.com targets the adult escort service market with a classified ads platform that spans multiple countries including the US, Canada, UK, Australia, and several Asian countries. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its extensive geographic coverage and multimedia ad listings. Revenue likely derives from ad postings and adult SEO services. The target customers are individuals seeking companionship or escort services. The business shows signs of moderate digital maturity with a focus on user experience and SEO but lacks advanced privacy and security features. No clear partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks critical security headers that protect against common web attacks. There is no evidence of a formal security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program. The absence of WHOIS registration data reduces trust and may indicate privacy protection or registration issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Privacy compliance is minimal with no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to improve privacy compliance and GDPR adherence.
  3. Publish an incident response and abuse contact policy to enhance security transparency and readiness.
  4. Obtain and publish clear WHOIS registration data or justify privacy protection to improve domain trustworthiness.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security culture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EscortsAffair.com
Description
EscortsAffair is an escort directory platform that allows users to search for female escorts offering incall and outcall services with photos and videos. The site provides local ads for companionship services across multiple countries and cities.
Key services
Escort listings, Incall and outcall services, Photo and video ads, Adult SEO services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Analytics, Font Awesome
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a large escort directory with extensive geographic coverage.
  2. Content is well structured with detailed service descriptions.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  4. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  5. Uses HTTPS and modern frontend technologies.
  6. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  7. WHOIS data is missing, which impacts trust and legitimacy.
  8. No social media links or company registration details found.
  9. Site includes links to privacy, terms, and contact pages.
  10. No evidence of security incident response or vulnerability disclosure.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern frontend stack with Bootstrap and jQuery, ensuring responsive design and good user experience. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking user behavior. The site loads external CSS and JS resources from its own subdomains and trusted CDNs. No CMS or backend technology is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and structured navigation. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing domain registration transparency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with escortsaffair.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review escortsaffair.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.