Skip to main content

Security report for erotickemasazeostrava.cz

Erotické masáže Ostrava · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Erotické masáže Ostrava is a small, newly established business specializing in erotic and tantra massage services in Ostrava, Czech Republic. The website presents a professional and well-structured digital presence with clear descriptions of services and a focus on client discretion and quality. The business targets adult clients seeking relaxation and sensual massage experiences. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with LiteSpeed caching and uses Cloudflare for DNS and name servers, indicating a modern hosting setup. Google Tag Manager is implemented for analytics and tracking purposes. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and CSRF protection on forms, but lacks important security headers and visible privacy and cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. The domain registration is recent but consistent with the business launch and location. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and moderately secure but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erotickemasazeostrava.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche market of erotic massage services within the Czech Republic, focusing on the Ostrava region. It offers a variety of specialized massage types, including tantra, BDSM, and nuru massages, catering to adult clientele. The business model is service-based with direct client bookings through the website. The company appears to be independent without visible parent or subsidiary relationships, but it is linked to a partner domain that lists multiple branches. The website content and branding are consistent and targeted, supporting a clear market positioning as a quality local provider. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and improving digital marketing and compliance.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses Cloudflare DNS, which provides a solid foundation for security. The contact form includes nonce tokens to mitigate CSRF attacks. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which could expose the business to regulatory risks under GDPR. Incident response and security contact information are not provided, limiting readiness for security events. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with a consent mechanism to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency and trust by adding verified business registration details and social media presence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Erotické masáže Ostrava
Description
Tantra masáže a erotické masáže v Ostravě. Nabízí širokou paletu erotických masáží v Ostravě, včetně tantrických, nuru, body-to-body a dalších specializovaných masáží. Zaměřují se na diskrétnost, individuální přístup a profesionální služby v moderním prostředí.
Key services
Tantra masáž, Erotická masáž, BDSM masáž, Lingam masáž, Masáž v poloze 69, Pussycat masáž, Nuru masáž, Body-to-body masáž
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, LiteSpeed Cache, Google Tag Manager, Google Site Kit
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS and name servers
  • Contact form with nonce for CSRF protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, address, and contact form.
  4. Website uses modern technologies and WordPress CMS with LiteSpeed caching.
  5. Security headers are missing or not detected, which is a security improvement area.
  6. Domain is very new but consistent with the business profile.
  7. No social media links or email addresses explicitly found in the content.
  8. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking.
  9. Content is relevant and professionally presented for the target market.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8 with LiteSpeed caching technology, which supports good performance and scalability. Google Tag Manager and Google Site Kit are integrated for analytics and marketing insights. The site uses Cloudflare for DNS and name servers, improving DNS resilience and security. The HTML structure is valid and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for organization and breadcrumb navigation. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading implemented for images. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security hardening and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erotickemasazeostrava.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erotickemasazeostrava.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.