Skip to main content

Security report for ernstkalbfleisch.com

Ernst Kalbfleisch Projecten · Other · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ernst Kalbfleisch Projecten is a small Dutch consulting business specializing in creating and activating partnerships and relationships, with a focus on sports and organizational strengthening. The company offers services including partnerships, strategy, communication, and activation, targeting organizations seeking to enhance their partnerships and market presence. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern SEO practices and structured data, reflecting a solid digital presence. The technical infrastructure includes common WordPress plugins and themes, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, indicating room for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic but includes a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, with clear contact information and social media presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ernstkalbfleisch.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
58
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in a niche market focusing on sports-related partnerships and organizational consulting. Its business model revolves around project-based consulting and activations. The domain age aligns with the business founding year, supporting legitimacy. The partnership with DataSign.nl for website development indicates professional collaboration. The presence on LinkedIn, Twitter, and Instagram supports active engagement with clients and stakeholders. The company appears to maintain a focused portfolio of projects, emphasizing quality and specialization. No evidence of large-scale operations or subsidiaries was found, consistent with a small business profile.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and has domain status clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No security headers were detected in the HTML content, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response information, nor a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. The site uses common WordPress plugins, which should be regularly updated to avoid vulnerabilities. Cookie consent is implemented, supporting privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be enhanced with additional security controls and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to protect against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Add a security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ernst Kalbfleisch Projecten
Description
Creëren & activeren van relaties & partnerships. Sport staat vaak centraal. Organisaties sterker maken. Partnerships, Strategie, Communicatie, Activatie
Key services
Partnerships, Strategie, Communicatie, Activatie
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, Yoast SEO, Smart Slider 3, jQuery, FontAwesome, Google Fonts (Open Sans)
Frameworks
WPBakery Page Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Statcounter
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Statcounter
Tracking pixels
Statcounter
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is business-focused on partnerships and activations in sports and organizational strengthening
  3. Good use of SEO and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and webpage
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with email and phone
  5. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  7. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. No security headers detected in HTML content
  9. DNSSEC not enabled, which is a security improvement opportunity
  10. Website uses WordPress with common plugins and themes
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using the Impreza child theme and WPBakery Page Builder. It employs Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Smart Slider 3 for interactive sliders. The site loads jQuery and FontAwesome for UI elements and icons. Google Fonts (Open Sans) is used for typography. The site is hosted on infrastructure associated with the domain registrar NextName B.V., though exact hosting provider details are not explicit. Performance is moderate with some optimization for mobile devices. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and JSON-LD structured data. There is no evidence of heavy technical debt or outdated technologies, but security enhancements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ernstkalbfleisch.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ernstkalbfleisch.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.