Skip to main content

Security report for ergolain.lt

ERGOLAIN GROUP · Manufacturing · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

36/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ergolain Group is a medium-sized Lithuanian company specializing in the production and sale of high-quality ergonomic and office furniture, serving primarily the Baltic states. The company offers professional office installation projects and targets businesses and institutions seeking ergonomic furniture solutions. Their market position is strong within the Baltic region as a leading furniture producer and seller. The website is built on WordPress CMS and employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, and various marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. The site is well-structured with good SEO practices and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and form validation implemented, though it lacks some security headers and explicit privacy and cookie policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to an invalid domain WHOIS response, which slightly reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a professional and credible business presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ergolain.lt

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
36

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Ergolain operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on ergonomic and office furniture for commercial and institutional clients. Their business model includes both product sales and project-based office installations. The company leverages a multilingual website to serve multiple Baltic countries and maintains active social media channels for marketing and customer engagement. The presence of certificates and client reviews indicates a focus on quality and customer trust. The company appears to have a stable market position with a medium-sized operational scale. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The website content and structure support a professional brand image and facilitate customer interaction through contact forms and newsletter subscriptions.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure form validation techniques, which are positive security indicators. However, it lacks several important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could enhance protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security contact information is provided, and there is no security.txt file for vulnerability disclosure. Tracking technologies like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used, indicating moderate user tracking. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing additional headers, privacy notices, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible links and consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance web security.
  3. Publish incident response contact information and consider adding a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency about data collection and retention policies to build user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ERGOLAIN GROUP
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ERGOLAIN GROUP
Description
Ergolain is one of the best high-quality furniture producer and seller in Baltic states. Professional office installation projects.
Key services
Furniture production, Furniture sales, Office installation projects
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, LayerSlider, Owl Carousel, MailerLite, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yoast SEO, WPML
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with async loading
  • Form validation with jQuery Validate

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
MailerLite
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No privacy or cookie policy pages explicitly found
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses
  4. Use of multiple tracking and marketing scripts including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel
  5. No visible security.txt or incident response contact information
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain registration trust verification
  7. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries
  8. Good SEO metadata and structured data present
  9. No obvious security vulnerabilities detected in the HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a mature and widely adopted technology stack centered on WordPress CMS with plugins for SEO (Yoast), multilingual support (WPML), and marketing automation (MailerLite). Frontend technologies include jQuery, Bootstrap, LayerSlider, and Owl Carousel for UI components and animations. The site is moderately performant with asynchronous loading of analytics and marketing scripts. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO metadata is well implemented. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site shows no signs of technical debt or deprecated libraries but would benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ergolain.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ergolain.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.