Skip to main content

Security report for erdalemploymentlaw.com

Erdal Employment Law · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Erdal Employment Law is a small legal practice specializing in employment law, offering services such as workplace dispute resolution and legal consultation. The website is built on WordPress with Bootstrap framework, indicating a modern but basic technical infrastructure. Security measures include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA for form protection; however, advanced security headers and DNSSEC are not implemented, representing areas for improvement. The domain is relatively new, registered in 2022, consistent with the business profile. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which is a compliance gap. Overall, the website presents a professional image but lacks comprehensive privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching erdalemploymentlaw.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm targets employers and employees needing employment law services, positioning itself as a niche legal service provider. The business model is professional services with direct client engagement. The website content is basic but relevant, with no detected certifications or trust badges. The lack of social media presence or partner domains suggests a focused but limited digital footprint. Growth potential could be enhanced by adding more trust signals and compliance documentation.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced and use of Google reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security maturity. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited readiness for security incidents. The domain registrar protections are standard and appropriate. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing a security policy.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security.
  3. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security incident response contact information.
  5. Enhance website content with trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, and social media links.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Erdal Employment Law
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Erdal Employment Law
Description
Erdal Employment Law is a legal practice specializing in employment law, providing legal services and advice related to workplace rights, employment disputes, and labor regulations.
Key services
Employment law consultation, Workplace dispute resolution, Legal representation in employment matters
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 5.3.0-alpha3, Gravity Forms, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is focused on employment law legal services.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information such as emails or phone numbers not explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  5. Uses modern frontend framework Bootstrap and WordPress CMS.
  6. Security practices include HTTPS and Google reCAPTCHA but lack advanced security headers and DNSSEC.
  7. WHOIS data shows a recently registered domain with standard registrar protections.
  8. No evidence of advertising or tracking services beyond Google reCAPTCHA.
  9. No social media links or business certifications detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap 5.3.0-alpha3 for responsive design and Gravity Forms for form handling, protected by Google reCAPTCHA. Hosting is via GoDaddy.com, LLC. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are basic but present. The lack of DNSSEC and security headers are technical risks. The site design is professional but content is minimal, limiting user engagement potential.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with erdalemploymentlaw.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review erdalemploymentlaw.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.