Skip to main content

Security report for eps.fr

EPS · Other · France

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EPS is a well-established French company specializing in connected alarm systems and remote monitoring services, positioning itself as a market leader with over 700,000 subscribers. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, offering comprehensive information about its services, recruitment, and corporate news. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools, with good mobile optimization and user experience. Privacy compliance is well addressed through detailed cookie management and privacy policies. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification, and no direct contact emails or phone numbers are present on the homepage, which could impact user trust and support accessibility. Security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and explicit incident response information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eps.fr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
75
Email security
40
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EPS operates in the security services sector, focusing on alarm systems and telesurveillance primarily in France. The company benefits from strong market positioning supported by multiple industry awards and recognitions. Its business model revolves around subscription-based remote monitoring services. The website indicates affiliation with Crédit Mutuel Alliance Fédérale through the use of their internal JOBS solution for recruitment tracking. The target audience includes residential and commercial clients seeking security solutions. The company maintains an active presence on LinkedIn and YouTube, enhancing its marketing and customer engagement. The lack of visible direct contact information on the homepage suggests a possible focus on digital engagement channels or contact via dedicated pages.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS usage implied and a robust cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy choices. However, no explicit security headers were detected in the provided data, and there is no visible security policy or incident response contact information. The presence of third-party analytics and tracking scripts necessitates regular security audits to mitigate risks. The absence of a security.txt file and direct security contact channels limits transparency for vulnerability reporting. Overall, the site shows good privacy compliance but could enhance its security maturity by publishing detailed security policies and implementing additional HTTP security headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page including incident response procedures and security contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file at the root domain to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to comply with WCAG standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and analytics tools to minimize security vulnerabilities and privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EPS
Description
EPS is a leader in connected alarm systems with remote monitoring services in France, with nearly 40 years of expertise and over 700,000 subscribers.
Key services
Connected alarm systems, Remote monitoring (télésurveillance), Security solutions for homes and businesses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Piano Analytics, YouTube embedded player, TagCommander (TC) tag management
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls
  • Use of HTTPS implied (no explicit data but modern site with video consent and analytics)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Piano Analytics, TagCommander
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Piano Analytics, TagCommander
Marketing tools
TagCommander, Piano Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French.
  2. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  3. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust analysis.
  4. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  6. Social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube confirmed.
  7. No forms detected on the homepage; recruitment and contact pages linked but not included in provided HTML.
  8. No explicit security policy or incident response contacts visible.
  9. Good use of modern JavaScript libraries and tracking tools.
  10. No signs of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components, with integration of Piano Analytics and TagCommander for tracking and analytics. The site is mobile responsive and includes cookie consent management with granular user controls. Performance appears moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eps.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eps.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.