Skip to main content

Security report for eolane.com

Eolane France · Manufacturing · France

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eolane France was an electronics manufacturing services company operating production sites in France and Morocco. The company has ceased operations and is undergoing judicial liquidation, with its activities acquired by the Cicor Group, a pan-European EMS provider. The website serves primarily as a notice to visitors about this business status change and redirects users to the Cicor Group for further information. The digital presence is minimal and lacks typical corporate website features such as privacy policies, contact information, or detailed business descriptions. From a technical perspective, the website is basic with no detected CMS or advanced technologies. It lacks SEO optimization, accessibility features, and security headers. The domain is well-established and consistent with the business history but does not implement DNSSEC, which could enhance domain security. No analytics or tracking technologies are present, indicating minimal digital marketing or user tracking. Security posture is weak due to the absence of security headers and policies, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. Overall, the website functions as a static informational page rather than an active business site. The risk assessment highlights the need for improved security configurations and compliance documentation if the site were to be repurposed. However, given the business cessation, the current state aligns with a decommissioned or placeholder site. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing clear contact and incident response information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of eolane.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eolane.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
50
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eolane France operated in the manufacturing sector, specifically providing electronic manufacturing services with multiple production sites in France and Morocco. The company ceased operations and entered judicial liquidation, with its assets acquired by the Cicor Group. This indicates a transition phase and potential consolidation in the EMS market. The business model was focused on manufacturing services for electronics, targeting industrial clients requiring EMS solutions. The acquisition by Cicor Group suggests strategic market positioning by Cicor to expand its footprint in Europe. The website's minimal content and lack of active business information reflect the company's closure status. There is no evidence of ongoing revenue streams or active customer engagement through the website. The partnership ecosystem now includes Cicor Group as the primary related entity.

Security posture

The website exhibits a low security maturity level. There are no security headers detected, no HTTPS/SSL configuration details available, and DNSSEC is not enabled on the domain. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating a lack of GDPR compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, and no contact channels for security issues are visible. The website does not collect user data or have forms, reducing attack surface but also limiting user engagement. The domain is protected from unauthorized transfer, which is a positive security control. Overall, the security posture is minimal and would require significant improvements if the site were to be used for active business operations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to protect users.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and improve transparency.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Establish an incident response process and publish vulnerability disclosure guidelines to improve security culture and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eolane France
Description
Eolane France was an electronics manufacturing services provider with production sites in France and Morocco. The company has ceased operations and is undergoing judicial liquidation. Its activities at seven production sites were acquired by the Cicor Group, a pan-European EMS provider.
Key services
Electronic Manufacturing Services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and serves as a notice of business cessation and judicial liquidation.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present.
  3. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses are provided.
  4. No forms or data collection mechanisms are present.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. The website redirects visitors to the acquiring company Cicor Group for further information.
  7. No analytics or tracking technologies detected.
  8. The domain is stable and long-standing but the website is effectively a placeholder notice.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a simple static HTML page with inline CSS styling and no detected JavaScript libraries or frameworks. There is no CMS or platform detected. The domain is registered with Gandi SAS since 2000, indicating a stable and long-term presence. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a technical gap. No analytics or tracking technologies are present, suggesting minimal digital marketing efforts. The website is mobile responsive at a basic level due to viewport meta tag and simple CSS flexbox layout. SEO optimization is poor with minimal metadata and no Open Graph or structured data present. Performance is likely moderate given the minimal content and lack of heavy resources. Accessibility features are basic with no ARIA roles or landmarks detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is minimal and suitable only for a static informational page.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 54/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eolane.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eolane.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.