Skip to main content

Security report for eo.se

Scandinavian Print Group · Manufacturing · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Scandinavian Print Group is the largest printing group in Scandinavia, offering a wide range of printing and graphic services supported by intelligent IT solutions. With over 700 employees and a turnover exceeding 800 million DKK, the company operates multiple subsidiaries across Sweden, Denmark, Poland, Norway, and Germany. Their services include digital solutions, graphic design, distribution, logistics, advertising products, and book production. The website demonstrates a mature digital infrastructure using ASP.NET WebForms, jQuery, and integrates Usercentrics for consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and consent-based tracking, though security headers could be improved. The company shows strong compliance with GDPR and provides comprehensive privacy and terms of service documentation. Overall, the website is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
3/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eo.se

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
3
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a leading market position in the Scandinavian printing industry, leveraging a broad portfolio of services and subsidiaries to serve B2B customers. Their business model focuses on integrated printing solutions combined with digital and logistic services, enabling efficient customer workflows. The presence of multiple brands and geographic locations indicates a robust partnership and operational ecosystem. The company targets corporate clients needing high-quality print and marketing materials, with a focus on scalability and service breadth. Growth indicators include a large employee base and extensive service offerings. Strategic observations highlight their investment in IT solutions and logistics as competitive advantages.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security maturity level with enforced HTTPS, use of a reputable consent management platform (Usercentrics), and Google Tag Manager configured to default deny tracking until consent is given. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options suggests room for improvement. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. GDPR compliance is well addressed through privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional headers and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file and provide explicit incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  3. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced and maintain up-to-date versions.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with WCAG standards and broaden user inclusivity.
  5. Continue to monitor and optimize website performance and mobile responsiveness to maintain excellent user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Scandinavian Print Group AB
Registration number
5563236776
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Scandinavian Print Group
Description
Scandinavian Print Group levererar trycktjänster av alla slag baserade på intelligenta IT-lösningar som gör livet enklare och billigare för kunder. De är Skandinaviens största grafiska företag med över 700 anställda och en omsättning på över 800 miljoner DKK.
Key services
Trycktjänster, Digitala lösningar, Grafisk design och layout, Distributionstjänster, Lager- och logistiktjänster, Reklamartiklar och profilkläder, Tidningsproduktion, Kalenderproduktion, Point of Sale, Bokproduktion
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.1, Usercentrics Consent Management Platform, Google Tag Manager, Slick Slider, ASP.NET WebForms
Frameworks
ASP.NET WebForms
Platforms
Windows Server (implied by ASP.NET)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical link uses https)
  • Consent management via Usercentrics
  • Google Tag Manager with consent defaults to denied
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Usercentrics CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive product and service offerings clearly presented
  3. Strong presence of consent management and privacy compliance
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  5. Multiple subsidiary brands and geographic presence in Scandinavia and Poland
  6. No exposed sensitive data or security vulnerabilities detected in HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET WebForms technology with jQuery and modern JavaScript libraries for UI components like slick sliders. It integrates Usercentrics for GDPR-compliant consent management and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. The site uses responsive design techniques and Google Fonts for typography. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in loading times and asset delivery. The technical stack is mature but could benefit from modernization to newer frameworks for improved maintainability and performance. No CMS is explicitly detected. Hosting details are not disclosed but implied to be on Windows-based infrastructure. The site is SEO optimized with canonical links and meta tags. Accessibility is basic but could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eo.se. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eo.se.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.