Skip to main content

Security report for enzo.lv

E-commerce · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enzo.lv operates an e-commerce platform primarily targeting general consumers interested in purchasing products online. The website is built on a modern WordPress infrastructure using WooCommerce and Elementor, supported by the Astra theme, indicating a mature digital presence suitable for small to medium-sized online retail operations. The site demonstrates basic GDPR compliance through a cookie consent mechanism but lacks explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages, which are critical for full regulatory adherence. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, but the absence of security headers and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts full domain legitimacy verification, though the accessible content and technology stack imply a legitimate business. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enzo.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
45
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the e-commerce sector, focusing on online retail. The website targets a general audience with a straightforward shopping experience. The use of WooCommerce and Elementor suggests a flexible and scalable business model capable of expanding product offerings. The absence of detailed company information and contact data limits insights into market positioning and partnerships. The cookie consent implementation indicates awareness of privacy regulations, which is positive for customer trust. Growth potential exists if the business enhances transparency and compliance documentation. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and uses a cookie consent banner to address privacy concerns. However, no advanced security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could mitigate common web attacks. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy reduces transparency in incident handling. No contact channels for security incidents were found, which is a gap in incident response readiness. The site uses popular and regularly updated WordPress plugins, reducing the risk of known vulnerabilities if maintained properly. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from enhanced policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and customer support.
  5. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain platform security.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
E-commerce website selling products (specific product details not found in provided content).
Key services
online retail
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, Elementor, jQuery, PHP, CSS3, HTML5
Frameworks
Astra Theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
WordPress.com Stats
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
WordPress.com Stats (stats.wp.com)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce e-commerce site selling products.
  2. Cookie consent banner is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content is accessible.
  8. Site uses modern WordPress plugins and themes with Elementor builder.
  9. No explicit or adult content detected; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building, supported by the Astra theme. It uses jQuery and standard web technologies (HTML5, CSS3). The site loads external resources from trusted domains such as Google Fonts and WordPress.com stats. Performance is moderate with no evident blocking scripts or heavy resources. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design evident in CSS. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags and canonical links but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for small to medium e-commerce operations but could be enhanced with better SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enzo.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enzo.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.