Skip to main content

Security report for envases.de

Envases Öhringen GmbH · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Envases Öhringen GmbH is a well-established German manufacturer specializing in metal and plastic packaging solutions, serving industries such as paints, chemicals, food, and beverages. The company holds a strong market position, notably as a world leader in 5-liter party kegs for breweries, and emphasizes sustainability and innovation in its product offerings. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, multilingual support, and comprehensive business information. Technically, the site is built on the Jimdo Creator platform, leveraging modern web standards including HTTPS with strong TLS protocols and OCSP stapling, ensuring secure and performant user experiences. Security posture is solid with appropriate headers and no detected vulnerabilities, though improvements in DNS security and incident response transparency are recommended. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the site demonstrates high trustworthiness and business credibility, supporting Envases Öhringen GmbH's reputation as a global packaging leader.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
18/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching envases.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
18
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on metal and plastic packaging, targeting industrial clients globally. Its business model centers on product innovation, quality assurance, and sustainability, supported by ISO certifications and a global footprint spanning multiple continents. The website's content and linked social media channels indicate active engagement with customers and stakeholders. The presence of a whistleblower system and supplier codes of conduct reflect a commitment to corporate responsibility. Partnerships such as minikeg.blog suggest ecosystem collaboration within the beverage packaging niche. The company’s digital infrastructure supports multilingual content and e-commerce readiness, positioning it well for continued growth and market expansion.

Security posture

Envases Öhringen GmbH's website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, modern TLS versions, and OCSP stapling. Security headers like Strict-Transport-Security are present but could be enhanced with includeSubDomains and preload directives. No vulnerable cipher suites or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site uses secure cookie consent mechanisms and avoids common security pitfalls. However, the absence of DNSSEC and CAA records represents an opportunity to strengthen domain security. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Overall, the security measures align well with industry best practices for a manufacturing business website.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and CAA records to improve domain and certificate security.
  2. Enhance HSTS header with includeSubDomains and preload options for stronger HTTPS enforcement.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Implement a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and privacy policies to maintain GDPR compliance and user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Envases Öhringen GmbH
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Jimdo's platform using nginx, with TLS 1.2 and 1.3 protocols enabled and OCSP stapling active, ensuring secure and efficient HTTPS connections. The tech stack includes Jimdo Creator CMS, embedded YouTube videos with privacy-enhanced mode, and external resources served from Jimdo's CDN. Performance metrics indicate fast load times, and the site is mobile responsive with good SEO optimization including meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but functional. The site uses modern JavaScript and CSS loading techniques to optimize user experience. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies, positioning the site well for maintainability and scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with envases.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review envases.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.